<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Digital Entertainment 2.0</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011-03-01:/blog//5</id>
    <updated>2011-08-19T10:01:03Z</updated>
    <subtitle>New business models for film, TV and games in a multi-screen, 3D/HD, mobile world</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.37</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Augmented TV Opportunity: disruption, new devices and social media</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/08/augmented-tv-opportunity-disruption-new-devices-and-social-media.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.1034</id>

    <published>2011-08-17T13:05:42Z</published>
    <updated>2011-08-19T10:01:03Z</updated>

    <summary> Anthony Rose, co-founder and CTO of tBone, and former leading light in the development of the iPlayer and music sharing service Kazaa, describes how social media and new devices will transform TV into a seamless social experience. What are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Collinson</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=14</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Aug%2016%20Anthony%20Rose%20BPL%20Still%20image.png"><img alt="Aug 16 Anthony Rose BPL Still image.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/08/Aug 16 Anthony Rose BPL Still image-thumb-300x166-271.png" width="300" height="166" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p>

<p>Anthony Rose, co-founder and CTO of tBone, and former leading light in the development of the iPlayer and music sharing service Kazaa, describes how social media and new devices will transform TV into a seamless social experience.  What are the opportunities and who are the new players? <a href="http://telco2.6connex.com/vep/index.html?eventname=bestpracticelive&langR=en_US&share=true&share=true#nid=node31419;cid=15399">Register and view the video here</a>. It's one of several on digital entertainment from our recent 'Best Practice Live! global online event. You can also join us in person to discuss more on M-Commerce 2.0 strategies in <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/MCommerce2_Oct2011/index.php">New York</a> (5th-6th October) and <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/EMEA_Nov2011/index.php">London</a> (8th-9th December).<br /> </p>

<p>Or, to book a place at our Digital Entertainment 2.0 workshop on <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/EMEA_Nov2011/digentertainment.php">New Business Models for the Home Video Entertainment market in Europe - Lessons from America</a> at our London Executive Brainstorm on 8th November, please email contact@telco2.net or call +44 (0) 207 247 5003.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Next Generation TV: Virgin Media&apos;s TiVo Service</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/08/next-generation-tv-virgin-medias-tivo-service.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.1033</id>

    <published>2011-08-17T12:08:27Z</published>
    <updated>2011-08-19T10:01:38Z</updated>

    <summary> The UK&apos;s Virgin Media claim to have &apos;re-invented TV&apos; with their TiVo offering which offers personalised, targeted content recommendations and highly programmable storage. Register and view this short demo video and introduction on the TiVo service by Alex Green,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Collinson</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=14</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://telco2.6connex.com/vep/index.html?eventname=bestpracticelive&langR=en_US&share=true#nid=node31419;cid=15430"><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Aug%2016%20Alex%20Green%20BPL%20Still%20image.png"><img alt="Aug 16 Alex Green BPL Still image.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/08/Aug 16 Alex Green BPL Still image-thumb-300x165-269.png" width="300" height="165" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></a></p>

<p>The UK's Virgin Media claim to have 're-invented TV' with their TiVo offering which offers personalised, targeted content recommendations and highly programmable storage. Register and view this <a href="http://telco2.6connex.com/vep/index.html?eventname=bestpracticelive&langR=en_US&share=true#nid=node31419;cid=15430">short demo video and introduction on the TiVo service</a> by Alex Green, Executive Director, Commercial, TV and Online, Virgin Media. It's one of several from our recent 'Best Practice Live! global online event. You can also join us in person to discuss more on M-Commerce 2.0 strategies in <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/MCommerce2_Oct2011/index.php">New York</a> (5th-6th October) and <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/EMEA_Nov2011/index.php">London</a> (8th-9th December).<br /></p>

<p>Or, to book a place at our Digital Entertainment 2.0 workshop on <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/EMEA_Nov2011/digentertainment.php">New Business Models for the Home Video Entertainment market in Europe - Lessons from America</a> at our London Executive Brainstorm on 8th November, please email contact@telco2.net or call +44 (0) 207 247 5003.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Apple vs YouTube, and the impact of tablets, digital lockers - Industry Strategy Update</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/08/apple-vs-youtube-and-the-impact-of-tablets-digital-lockers---industry-strategy-update.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.1032</id>

    <published>2011-08-17T11:49:02Z</published>
    <updated>2011-08-19T10:02:49Z</updated>

    <summary> In this video,Digital Entertainment 2.0&apos;s Keith McMahon describes how consumer behaviour is changing, tablets are emerging as a &apos;fourth screen&apos;, and internet, cable and other major retail players are evolving digital entertainment strategies including &apos;digital lockers&apos; that store consumer...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Collinson</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=14</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://telco2.6connex.com/vep/index.html?eventname=bestpracticelive&langR=en_US&mcc=&share=true#nid=node31419;cid=15366"><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Aug%2016%20Keith%20McMahon%20BPL%20Still%20image.png"><img alt="Aug 16 Keith McMahon BPL Still image.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/08/Aug 16 Keith McMahon BPL Still image-thumb-300x168-267.png" width="300" height="168" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></a></p>

<p>In<a href="http://telco2.6connex.com/vep/index.html?eventname=bestpracticelive&langR=en_US&mcc=&share=true#nid=node31419;cid=15366"> this video</a>,Digital Entertainment 2.0's Keith McMahon describes how consumer behaviour is changing, tablets are emerging as a 'fourth screen', and internet, cable and other major retail players are evolving digital entertainment strategies including 'digital lockers' that store consumer content in the cloud. Who will be the winners and losers?<br /><br />NB You'll need to <a href="http://telco2.6connex.com/vep/index.html?eventname=bestpracticelive&langR=en_US&mcc=&share=true#nid=node31419;cid=15366">register to view this video here</a>, once of several from our recent 'Best Practice Live! global online event. You can also join us in person to discuss more on M-Commerce 2.0 strategies in <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/MCommerce2_Oct2011/index.php">New York</a> (5th-6th October) and <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/EMEA_Nov2011/index.php">London</a> (8th-9th December).<br /></p>

<p>Or, to book a place at our Digital Entertainment 2.0 workshop on <a href="http://www.newdigitaleconomics.com/EMEA_Nov2011/digentertainment.php">New Business Models for the Home Video Entertainment market in Europe - Lessons from America</a> at our London Executive Brainstorm on 8th November, please email contact@telco2.net or call +44 (0) 207 247 5003.</p>

<p>     </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>UK Digital TV Update</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/07/uk-digital-tv-update.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.1016</id>

    <published>2011-07-11T15:48:58Z</published>
    <updated>2011-07-11T16:26:24Z</updated>

    <summary>The UK regulator, OFCOM, publishes a quarterly report outlining the state of UK TV market and progress in digitalisation ahead of analogue TV close-down in the Digital Switch Over (DSO) which is due to be completed in 2012. Some Important...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Harrowell</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=7</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="data" label="data" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="freesat" label="freesat" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="satellite" label="satellite" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sky" label="sky" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="television" label="television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="uk" label="UK" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="virginmedia" label="virgin media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="youview" label="youview" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The UK regulator, OFCOM, publishes a quarterly report outlining the state of UK TV market and progress in digitalisation ahead of analogue TV close-down in the Digital Switch Over (DSO) which is due to be completed in 2012.</p>

<h2>Some Important Data Points: Primary Household TV Sets</h2>

<p><img alt="UK primary TV sets" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/primarytvs.png" width="650" height="304" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>Satellite is the primary method of delivering TV onto the primary screen in the home (42% Satellite, 38% Digital Terrestrial TV, 11% Cable and 6% Analogue). We previously assumed that as DSO happened the decline in analogue homes would have moved to Digital Terrestrial TV (DTT). It appears that this hasn't happened and instead many have switched to Satellite.  It is worth noting that in the UK, Satellite has two main platforms: FreeSat - 2m homes; and the BskyB payTV service (9.3m).  A majority of UK homes (52.25%) take a payTV service.<br />
 <br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are intrigued by the growth in Freesat homes. There are a lot of HD channels on FreeSat compared to DTT which may account for the platform's growth. Integrated TVs (idTV) which have digital tuners inbuilt nowadays have satellite tuners as well as DTT, so the incremental cost for Freesat viewing is limited. We believe that more and more people prefer the capacity and quality of Freesat - and more importantly are becoming aware of this as penetration increases amongst friends and family.</p>

<h2>Secondary TV Sets</h2>

<p>DTT dominates on other TV sets with a lot of secondary sets still to convert from analogue (8.5m - 24%). Of the 26.4m secondary sets converted - approximately 20.5m are on DTT. With only a limited time left before DSO, we suspect that this secondary set issue isn't as bad as the survey data shows. A lot of people will have DTT-capable TV's but just watch analogue TV on them.</p>

<p>If BSkyB or Virgin Media (the UK Cable company) ever manage to develop reasonable "video distribution round the home" solutions, there is a lot of low-hanging fruit in platform penetration. The question is of course whether people will pay for it. The recently announced <a href="http://corporate.sky.com/media/press_releases/2011/sky_go_launches_as_customers_get_even_better_value_from_sky.htm">SkyGo strategy</a> (for PCs, tablets, phones) implies that BSkyB are thinking of allowing secondary screens to access their content for no incremental cost. This makes their multiroom £10/month pricing look a little strange. BSkyb with their 2.2m multiroom subscribers have approximately a £220m/annum revenue stream. The following chart shows the scale of the opportunity: BSkyB homes have DTT use on 6.2m sets and VMED have 2.6m.</p>

<p><img alt="platformoverlap.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/platformoverlap.png" width="650" height="451" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<h2>Other payTV platforms</h2>

<p>Other payTV platforms are still languishing. 0.3m DTT (TopUpTV) and 0.5m IPTV (mainly BTvision). These platforms lack scale and surely will be consolidated around the time of YouView. Youview is the next generation set-top box which combines both payTV and DTT services, see <a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/youview-the-future-of-british-tv-or-another-domesday-project.html">here</a> for an analysis of the progress.</p>

<h2>DTT Equipment Sales</h2>

<p>In Q1 there were 3.4m DTT equipment sales (inc. STBs, PVRs and IDTVs) compared to 3.6m a year ago. The decline is mainly from stand-alone STBs. </p>

<p><img alt="dttequipmentsales.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/dttequipmentsales.png" width="650" height="316" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>We believe this is a worrying trend for DTT as the market size doesn't allow for UK variants of standard European technology. Hence Sony have publically said that they will not support YouView. Technicolour and  Cisco have also recently said that they will not building YouView boxes. </p>

<p>Most of the equipment volume is coming from the sale of idTVs. These days you cannot buy a TV in the UK without an integrated DTT tuner and therefore a significant percentage of these volumes may be going into BSkyB and Virgin Media homes.<br />
In summary, there is no evidence that DSO is harming either BSkyB or Virgin Media. In fact probably the corollary is true, DSO is creating opportunities for the payTV operators. We expect to see a further wave of innovation in both platforms functionality and pricing in 2012 when YouView is launched. But, we cannot see anything in the data which provides a crumb of hope for the YouView success.</p>

<p>Please note most OFCOM data is survey based and therefore subject to 1-2% margin of error ( +/-500k homes).</p>

<p>Source: <a href="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/tv-research/dtv/dtv-site/">http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/tv-research/dtv/dtv-site/</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>News Analysis: Spotify/Virgin Media, Hulu, AMC Float, Amazon, Gaming $74bn, Twitter Twits</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/07/news-analysis-spotifyvirgin-media-hulu-amc-float-amazon-gaming-74bn-twitter-twits.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.1014</id>

    <published>2011-07-08T11:06:25Z</published>
    <updated>2011-07-08T12:22:37Z</updated>

    <summary>In this issue: Music: Spotify Hooks Up with Virgin Media Video: Hulu Up For Sale Cable Networks: AMC Spin Off from Cablevision Gaming: 2011 Gartner Ecosystem Forecast Publishing: Amazon punts on The Book Depository And Finally: Twitter Twits trying to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Harrowell</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=7</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Online Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="amazon" label="Amazon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cable" label="cable" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="music" label="music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="p2p" label="p2p" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="paytv" label="Pay TV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="twitter" label="twitter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="virginmedia" label="virgin media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In this issue:</p>

<ul>
	<li>Music: Spotify Hooks Up with Virgin Media</li>
	<li>Video: Hulu Up For Sale</li>
	<li>Cable Networks: AMC Spin Off from Cablevision</li>
	<li>Gaming: 2011 Gartner Ecosystem Forecast</li>
	<li>Publishing: Amazon punts on The Book Depository</li>
	<li>And Finally: Twitter Twits trying to get more money</li>
	<li>Music: Spotify Hooks Up with Virgin Media</li>
</ul>

<h2>Music: Spotify Hooks Up with Virgin Media</h2>
<img alt="spotvm.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/spotvm.png" width="200" height="70" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />

<p>Virgin Media has signed an exclusive deal with Spotify for its music streaming service. Virgin Media is the second largest ISP in the UK, with over 4m households using their network to watch TV, browse the internet, and use their fixed and mobile services. The Virgin Media and Spotify hook-up covers PCs , TVs (via theTiVO set top box) and Mobiles at various price points. </p>

<p>Billboard has a <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/digital-and-mobile/spotify-virgin-media-partnership-is-the-1005264812.story">good summary of the deal</a> from the music business perspective.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<h2>Our Take</h2>

<p>Spotify signed a similar deal with Telia in Sweden in 2009, so Spotify using networks as a distribution channel is nothing new. Spotify presumably has the data to prove to networks how these type of deals can be turned into a win-win situation. The more interesting aspect of the deal is the networks angle.</p>

<p>We first heard of Virgin Media launching music services three years ago, but the launch was abandoned after Virgin Media couldn't economically secure the rights with the major music labels. The fact that Virgin Media is launching now indicates that the music labels are being far more reasonable in their terms.</p>

<p>The bigger picture is the political agenda in the UK around illegal filesharing. Virgin Media now have a reasonably priced carrot to offer to their consumers. The stick is that Virgin Media will soon be forced by UK law to suspend or even terminate customer connections who obtain content illegally whether music or video.</p>

<p>Two of the other ISPs, BT and TalkTalk, have been fiercely resisting the passing of this law, challenging its progress in the Courts. This resistance has irked both politicians and content owners. It will be extremely interesting to see whether they eventually develop a music offering. The other major, Sky, is a large content owner in their own right through their parent company NewsCorp. Sky launched a music service called SkySongs which was quickly abandoned as uneconomic. </p>

<p>The road for profitability for online music services is difficult, but they should be seen as part of the wider political battle to prevent illegal access to copyrighted content.</p>

<h2>Video: Hulu Up For Sale</h2> 
<img alt="hulu.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/hulu.png" width="200" height="89" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />

<p>Bob Iger of Disney, a Hulu shareholder, has confirmed that it is up for sale. The <em>LA Times</em>'s Company Town blog has the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/07/hulu-rehearses-its-sales-pitch-more-video-more-subscribers-.html">low down on the sales process and the growth in Hulu $8/month subscribers</a>.</p>

<h2>Our Take</h2>

<p>We are not surprised that the shareholders having taken this moment to put Hulu up for sale. The timing probably is the best evidence yet that we are in the middle of a tech valuation bubble.  The media owners seem to believe that they can get more now by selling up than through long term profitable growth in the business. </p>

<p>Hulu is still an early stage company with expected revenues in 2011 of US$500m, 1m $8/month subscribers (compared to 23m at Netflix) and the #1 USA video property, serving up 1.3bn ads in May alone. </p>

<p>The bidders face an awkward dilemma: the more they pay to Hulu owners (including Disney, Fox and NBCUniversal), the more other content owners will demand from them when their content deals are up for renewal and therefore the harder it will be for Hulu to reach profitability. In auction theory, this is termed the Winner's curse.</p>

<p>We remain short new online aggregators (Hulu, Netflix and YouTube) and long on traditional cable aggregators.</p>

<h2>Cable Networks: AMC Spin Off from Cablevision</h2>
<img alt="amc.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/amc.png" width="200" height="116" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />

<p>On June 30th, Cablevision spun off its programming arm AMC networks to existing shareholders. This effectively mirrors the move made by Time Warner in 2009 when it separated its cable business from its content business. </p>

<p>Multichannel News has the <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/470489-AMC_Networks_Spinoff_From_Cablevision_Is_Official.php">breakdown</a>.</p>

<h2>Our Take</h2>

<p>It is always fascinating to watch how the media conglomerates evolve - acquiring and disposing of properties along the value chain - and it is hard for analysts to generate hard and fast rules on how to create shareholder value. For instance, NewsCorp is currently seeking to acquire full control of its' UK DTH property, BSkyB, and heavily investing in its minority held German DTH property, Sky Deutschland.</p>

<p>What is apparent is that cable network programming is a highly profitable and cash-generating business. In 2010, AMC networks had revenue of just over US$1bn and operating income of US$280m. The AMC  networks suite of channels (AMC, We TV, IFC and The Sundance Channel) aren't the highest rated cable channels by a long way.</p>

<h2>Gaming: 2011 Gartner Ecosystem Forecast</h2>
<img alt="gartner.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/gartner.png" width="200" height="49" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />

<p>Gartner has published its <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1737414">2011 Gaming Ecosystem</a> report and it contains a few surprises. </p>

<p><img alt="gartner1.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/gartner1.png" width="343" height="131" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<h2>Our Take</h2>

<p>We are not surprised that Gartner is forecasting overall industry growth to US$112bn by 2015. The rise in Casual Gaming witnessed by Zynga and their partnership with Facebook has been phenomenal. Penetration has still a long way to go and somehow Zynga and their competitors throughout the world will find a way to monetize those eyeballs probably from a combination of advertising or virtual currencies.</p>

<p>We believe that dedicated Gaming Hardware will come under increasing pressure from multi-functional devices whether phones, tablets, laptops and even connected TVs. We have already seeing evidence of this, as handhelds such as the Sony Playstation Portable are declining in unit sales. People seem to be happy with playing games on their iPhones, Android and the like. Additionally, the logic for buying dedicated gaming consoles becomes a lot more strained as more games move online and TVs become connected. The outlook is not rosy for dedicated hardware.</p>

<p>Software is difficult to predict because the value is undermined by cheap "good enough" hits such as Angry Birds from Roxio available at never seen before price points in Mobile Application Stores. Also, the traditional method of distribution through DVDs at specialist retailers is under pressure from online delivery. In five years time, we believe that all games will be delivered online. These two trends will put software unit pricing under pressure. However given the boom in overall people playing games online, we believe overall volumes will increase sufficiently to offset this price decline.</p>

<p>In short our directional forecast is that Online Gaming growth will be huge, much faster than Gartner indicate; Gaming Software revenues will be under pressure as unit prices decline, but unit growth and the sale of subscriptions will probably mean that Gaming Software as a category will increase; but dedicated Gaming Hardware will suffer as people migrate to playing their games on multi-functional devices such as phones, tablets, PCs and laptops. </p>

<p>In short, we agree with Gartner's overall direction, but not on the make-up. It is not a good time to be in either Gaming Hardware or Specialist Gaming Retail.</p>

<h2>Publishing: Amazon punts on The Book Depository</h2>
<img alt="amazon.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/amazon.png" width="200" height="93" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />

<p>Amazon has made an agreed offer for the UK-based The Book Depository, which is a online bookselling competitor with a turnover of around £120m of which the majority is for overseas shipments.</p>

<p>(Via <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/book-depository-operate-independently-amazon.html">The Bookseller</a>.)</p>

<h2>Our Take</h2>

<p>We are surprised that Amazon is trying to make this purchase. It is hard to believe that The Book Depository brings any technology or distribution skills that Amazon does not already have. The transaction must all be about the market consolidation. Amazon has already voluntary referred the transaction to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) which exams monopolies in the UK. The Booksellers Association and Publishers Association have already said that they will formally oppose the merger.</p>

<p>The good news is that the OFT will publish its findings and thinking into the public domain and we might finally get some insight in the inner working of the Amazon machine. </p>

<p>We think Amazon might have just shot itself in the foot.</p>

<h2>And Finally: Twitter Twits trying to get more money</h2<
<img alt="twitter.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/twitter.png" width="200" height="103" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304803104576428020830361278.html"><em>Wall St Journal</em> broke the story</a> that Twitter is trying to raise more money at a US$7bn valuation barely seven months after raising US$200m at a US$3.7bn valuation.

<h2>Our Take</h2>

<p>Way back in 2009, we published <a href="http://www.telco2.net/blog/2009/07/twittonomics_how_will_twitter.html<br />
">"Twitt-o-nomics: Can Twitter ever make money?"</a> and came to the conclusion that Twitter's business model seems to be the familiar - "Web 2.0 Flip" - build an audience and sell to someone who thinks they can monetize it. Two years later, we are still of the same opinion with the added caveat that Twitter is now so expensive we doubt that anyone would be able make a return on a US$7bn investment. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>News Analysis: Pandora IPO, Netflix Vs Sony, Virgin vs BBC, Vodafone PayTV, Nook, Harry Potter </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news-analysis-pandora-ipo-netflix-vs-sony-virgin-vs-bbc-vodafone-paytv-nook-harry-potter.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.1005</id>

    <published>2011-06-24T14:13:44Z</published>
    <updated>2011-06-24T17:44:09Z</updated>

    <summary>In this issue: Music: Pandora is not worth $2.5Bn Video: Sony Films off Netflix - is $8/month sustainable? Cable: Virgin Media Vs the BBC in UK platform battle Telco: can Vodafone raise its Pay TV game in Germany? Publishing: Barnes...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Harrowell</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=7</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="news" label="news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In this issue:</p>

<ul>
	<li><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news_analysis_pandora_ipo_netflix_vs_sony_virgin_vs_bbc_vodafone_paytv_nook_harry_potter.html#pandora">Music: Pandora is not worth $2.5Bn</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news_analysis_pandora_ipo_netflix_vs_sony_virgin_vs_bbc_vodafone_paytv_nook_harry_potter.html#netflix">Video: Sony Films off Netflix - is $8/month sustainable?</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news_analysis_pandora_ipo_netflix_vs_sony_virgin_vs_bbc_vodafone_paytv_nook_harry_potter.html#virgin">Cable: Virgin Media Vs the BBC in UK platform battle</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news_analysis_pandora_ipo_netflix_vs_sony_virgin_vs_bbc_vodafone_paytv_nook_harry_potter.html#vodafone">Telco: can Vodafone raise its Pay TV game in Germany?</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news_analysis_pandora_ipo_netflix_vs_sony_virgin_vs_bbc_vodafone_paytv_nook_harry_potter.html#amazon">Publishing: Barnes & Noble Nook takes on Amazon</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/news_analysis_pandora_ipo_netflix_vs_sony_virgin_vs_bbc_vodafone_paytv_nook_harry_potter.html#potter">Books: Harry Potter disapparates from publisher's grasp</a></li>
</ul>

<h2>Music: Is Pandora worth US$2.5bn? Short answer: "No"</h2>
<img alt="pandora.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/pandora.png" width="200" height="150" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
Pandora, the largest internet radio broadcaster floated on June 16th at US$16 valuing the company at over US$2.5bn. Currently the share price stands at US$14, which implies the Stock Market thinks it is overpriced. Gigaom <a href="http://gigaom.com/2011/06/14/lessons-from-pandoras-tough-road-to-ipo/" name="pandora">has the lowdown on the 11-year battle for survival of Pandora</a>.

<h3>Our Take:</h3>

<p>The Pandora business model is flawed and doomed to fail. While 1.6bn listener hours by a 34m active customer base may seem impressive, the crucial problem lies in Pandora's content acquisition costs which are highly variable. Effectively the more people use Pandora, the more they have to pay. The business model just doesn't scale and is destined for a future of low, if any, margins.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Pandora pays two sets of royalties for the right to stream music. The first is for sound recording rights which are payable to SoundExchange. SoundExchange is the sole sound recording rights collection agency in the USA, collecting money from broadcasters and distributing to artists. These have been determined for 2011 after a lengthy court battle as the greater of 25% revenue or US$0.00102 per track (for non-subscribers). These per track fees rise every to US$0.0014 in 2014. In other words a 37% increase over 5 years.</p>

<p>Pandora also has to pay musical composition royalties to the major USA performing rights organizations (PROs) which are ASCAP, BMI and SESAC. It currently pays 1.75% of Gross Revenue to BMI and 0.38% to SESAC. These royalties are also therefore completely a variable cost. For the largest of PROs, ASCAP, the Pandora IPO doesn't reveal the royalty rate, but does reveal that it is dispute with ASCAP over what Pandora consider an onerous royalty rate. Once again, Pandora has to resort to the USA courts to determine a major element in its cost base.</p>

<p>Altogether, Pandora paid US$29m in royalties compared to total revenues of US$51m in the first quarter of 2011 or 57% of Gross Revenue. In the whole of 2010, Pandora paid US$69m royalties on total revenues of US$138m - or 50%.</p>

<p>Adding to the business model woes, Pandora only operates in the USA, because there are completely different licensing regimes for different countries, which makes internet radio a purely national rather than global play.</p>

<h2>Video: Sony Films off Netflix - is $8/month sustainable?</h2>

<p><img alt="netflix.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/netflix.png" width="128" height="96" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>Netflix got the rights to stream Sony Films through its much-talked about deal with the Starz Movie channel. The deal was struck in 2008 and is due to expire in 2012 and gave Netflix the right to stream Sony and Disney films. The problem seems to be that Netflix has grown so fast, it has triggered a clause in the Sony-Starz contract, whereby Sony is due more money.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/analysts-discuss-starzs-decision-pull-203340" name="netflix">The Hollywood Reporter has a round-up of analysts' opinions</a>.</p>

<h3>Our Take:</h3>

<p>Contract spats are an inevitable part of life for distributors. MSOs and DTHs face the same challenges and are frequently in the news for the loss of channels during contract negotiations. As Netflix grows in importance and the contract negotiations become ver ever larger sums of money, we expect to see more situations like the Sony Films withdrawal.</p>

<p>The real question is whether Netflix in the long run can put together a sufficiently attractive package against an $8/month consumer contract, and still provide an attractive return for its shareholders. We seriously doubt it and think 2012 will be the year of a fight back from the MSOs/DTHs with their TV everywhere services gathering serious momentum.</p>

<p>We plan on examining Netflix's prospects in a more in depth analysis when the 1st Half financial reporting season is complete.</p>

<h2>Cable: Virgin Media Vs the BBC in UK platform battle</h2>

<p><img alt="iplayer.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/iplayer.png" width="200" height="160" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>In the UK, Neil Berkett, the CEO of MSO Virgin Media, took to the Guardian, of which he is an non-executive director, to request that the BBC change its ways:</p>

<blockquote><em>Why then, just as the digital revolution is gaining unstoppable momentum, has the BBC suddenly changed tack and started trying to replicate its traditional dominance by developing its own entertainment platforms whose development and distribution it can exert control?</em></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2011/jun/20/virgin-media-chief-bbc-commercial-sector" name="virgin">More here</a>.</p>

<h3>Our Take:</h3>

<p>The BBC iPlayer has provided Virgin Media with a differentiator from their DTH rival, BskyB over the last few years. With the coming launch of YouView, Virgin Media is understandably worried that the UK broadcasters will use their on-demand content to improve the chances of YouView to succeed. We believe Neil Berkett is right to be worried.</p>

<p>The future connected TV landscape will not be shaped by technology alone; we believe that attracting premium content onto platforms will be just as important as the technology. As ever the content owners will in a large part be skewing the odds of success for the platforms.</p>

<p>However, the role of state owned broadcasters differs from their commercial counterparts. We believe Neil Berkett is right to question the BBC's strategy, but we don't believe any answers will be forthcoming in the near future as his pleas are likely to fall on deaf ears.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/youview-the-future-of-british-tv-or-another-domesday-project.html#more">Further reading: YouView - the future of British TV?</a></p>

<h2>Telco: can Vodafone raise its Pay TV game in Germany?</h2>
<img alt="vodafone.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/vodafone.png" width="200" height="142" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
Vodafone announced 25k subscribers to their €40/month German triple-play offer. Not happy with the 300 additions per day, Vodafone are planning a big marketing push in the 2nd half.

<p><a href="http://www.iptv-news.com/iptv_news/june_2011_2/marketing_offensive_planned_for_germanys_vodafone_tv" name="vodafone">More here.</a></p>

<h3>Our Take:</h3>

<p>PayTV is a scale business and Vodafone really needs to up its investment if it has any chance of making progress. Germany is underpenetrated in PayTV compared to other countries and competition seems to be hotting up. The incumbent Telco, Deutsche Telekom, has around 1.3m subscribers on its IPTV platform and has aggressive expansion ideas of its own. The Telcos are competing head on with a reinvigorated DTH provider, Sky Deutschland, and regional MSOs who are vigorously upgrading their plant to support the digital future.</p>

<p>Germany is probably going to become the most interesting battlefield for payTV in 2011/2012 and we expect both big investments and innovations. Later in the year, we'll be providing a deep analysis of the state of the German market.</p>

<h2>Publishing: Barnes & Noble Nook takes on Amazon</h2>
<img alt="nook.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/nook.png" width="200" height="83" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
Barnes & Noble are gaining momentum with their Amazon challenger strategy. Nook-related sales have grown to $250 million a year, with overall sales at BN.com at $858 million. Extremely healthy growth but still a pin-prick compared to physical stores ($4.4bn) and colleges ($1.8bn)

<p><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/business-news/reuters/2011/06/21/barnes-noble-hurt-by-borders-helped-by-nook" name="amazon">More detail here</a>.</p>

<h3>Our Take:</h3>

<p>E-Books and E-Readers are going to continue their rapid growth, but whether they cannibalize or add to physical sales is still an open question. We believe that publishers have to be far more innovative in their bundling strategies and would recommend experimentation with bundling both physical and digital copies of books together, in a similar way to how the movie studios are experimenting with Ultraviolet.</p>

<p>Barnes & Noble put their USA market share at 27% which lags well behind our estimates for Amazon at around 60%. We are at early stage in the digital transition, but the Barnes & Noble figures show that all is not lost for traditional booksellers. We are fascinated by the evolution of the market and especially in the recent surge of self-publishing.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.telco2.net/blog/2011/03/digital_entertainment_20_telco.html">Further reading: Ultraviolet</a>, <a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/03/amazon-building-an-online-distribution-platform-to-challenge-apple-and-google.html">Amazon</a>.</p>

<h2>Books: Harry Potter disapparates from publisher's grasp</h2>
<img alt="pottermore.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/pottermore.png" width="200" height="111" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" />
Harry Potter, arguably the most successful book (and movie) franchise of all time, gets a new home which is to be the exclusive distributor for eBooks. The Harry Potter franchise is owned by the author JK Rowling who retained the digital rights to the franchise and is the driving force behind the new <a href="http://www.pottermore.com/" name="potter">site</a>.

<h3>Our Take:</h3>

<p>We can't imagine that the eBook distributors, especially Amazon, are happy with the arrangement. We are intrigued by the presence of Overdrive who is providing the platform for the e-Books.  Overdrive also serves the Waterstone's and W H Smith's e-book stores, as well as being a major player in the library e-book lending market. Perhaps, we are seeing the emergence of serious competitor for Amazon in the UK.</p>

<p>In any event, as more details emerge, we'll publish an in-depth analysis covering self-publishing platforms and the rise of eBooks.</p>

<p><br />
To share this article easily, please click:</p><!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --><div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style "><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a><br />
<a class="addthis_counter addthis_bubble_style"></a></div><br />
<script type="text/javascript">var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};</script><br />
<script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4dfe6bb714a7334e" type="text/javascript"></script><!-- AddThis Button END --></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>iCloud/iOS: Apple tightens its platform grip </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/icloudios-apple-tightens-its-platform-grip.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.999</id>

    <published>2011-06-16T08:06:03Z</published>
    <updated>2011-06-16T14:54:12Z</updated>

    <summary>Digital Entertainment 2.0&apos;s analysis of how Apple&apos;s iCloud, iOS5, and MacOS developments build value and control for Apple&apos;s digital platform, and their consequences on other parts of the digital ecosystem. Introduction Apple provided a glimpse into some of the upcoming...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Collinson</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=14</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="apple" label="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="cloudcomputing" label="Cloud computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ios" label="iOS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ipad" label="iPad" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="iphone" label="iPhone" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="macosxlion" label="Mac OS X Lion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="macos" label="MacOS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newfeatures" label="new features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/events/">Digital Entertainment 2.0's</a> analysis of how Apple's iCloud, iOS5, and MacOS developments build value and control for Apple's digital platform, and their consequences on other parts of the digital ecosystem. 

<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><strong>Introduction</strong></font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">

</font><br /><br /><img alt="icloudious 1 - WWDC June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/icloudious%201%20-%20WWDC%20June%202011.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="375" width="502" />Apple provided a glimpse into some of the upcoming new features of its key software platforms iOS and MacOS at its WorldWide Developer Conference (WWDC) in June 2011. Also, Apple announced its much anticipated move into providing cloud based services and away from using the PC as the controlling hub.
 
<br /><br />iOS and MacOS are Apple's key software assets - the assets which add soul to Apple's key money spinning devices (iPhone, iPad and Mac). iCloud is the first iteration of the missing third leg - the software that ties all the devices together seamlessly. Together iOS, MacOS and iCloud are both the differentiator for the consumer and the barrier-to-entry for competitors.  They are the soul of the Apple overall platform.

<br /><br />For the Digital Entertainment 2.0 team, the main fascination is examining how the Apple platform is evolving and more importantly how new features affect others in the value chain: namely the various distributors including mobile operators, aggregators, content creators and of course end consumers. Nearly every main feature launched seems to support our general theory that Apple is squeezing value from the aggregators and distributors and pushing that value into the device manufacturers (i.e. them). 

<br /><br />As Apple only presented the top 10 features of both MacOS and iOS, we present below the top 10 features in the new releases of iOS, MacOS and iCloud, and explain how we think they create value for Apple and their impact on other parts of the digital ecosystem. The rest of this article covers:<br /><br /><ol><li>iMessage - killing SMS softly</li><li>iTunes in the Cloud - getting one up on Amazon</li><li>Notifications - Apple robs Windows Phone and Android advantage</li><li>MacOS Software - Apple shuts out other retailers</li><li>Newsstand - Appeasing Publishers (to a degree)</li><li>MobileMe - just 'making it work' ...and building the moat</li><li>iCloud and Video Services - holding fire for now</li><li>Activation - Cutting the PC cord</li><li>Photo Stream - yes, but why?</li><li>Data Centre Economics - making a start</li></ol>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><strong>1. iMessage - killing SMS softly</strong></font><img alt="icloudious 1a - iMessage iCloud June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/icloudious%201a%20-%20iMessage%20iCloud%20June%202011.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="302" width="302" />

iMessage, which is the primary mechanism for SMS and MMS features, has been radically reengineered with messages between Apple platform consumers no longer being carried on the mobile network SMS and MMS infrastructure. All of this happens transparently to the consumer and they don't need to know if their recipients are also using Apple devices - the message routing is determined by the Apple platform. 

<br /><br />iMessage is great for consumers as these onnet messages are free, but dreadful for MNOs as they all will probably take a hit on messaging revenues. Apple is competing with the MNO's core services, and they have even made it easier for consumers to see the value proposition by colouring the bubbles for onnet and offnet messages differently.

<br /><br />Apple has been quite clever in the timing of the release of this feature. Applications such as WhatsApp have already been blamed by some MNOs for declining messaging revenues. Apple effectively is doing nothing differently to them, just improving the consumer experience by making it easier to send and receive offnet messages. 

<br /><br />In terms of platform economics, Apple is adding value to the consumer via the device and squeezing value from the mobile network distributors. We believe it is only a matter of time before Apple start offering voice features. This, together with their video conferencing application Facetime, leaves mobile operators staring into the future where they will only be selling data access services. 

<br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><br /></font><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><strong>2. iTunes in the Cloud - getting one up on Amazon</strong></font>

<img alt="icloudious 2 - iTunes iCloud June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/icloudious%202%20-%20iTunes%20iCloud%20June%202011.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="357" width="500" />

The key value proposition of "iTunes in the Cloud" is that all songs historically purchased through iTunes are available for download to any Apple device at no extra cost wirelessly either through a WiFi or 3G connection as long as the consumer remains within their data tier. The user has control over which songs he wants to download to what devices thus avoiding a situation where all storage on an iPhone or iPad is consumed by a vast collection. 

<br /><br />The level of consumer control is such that a consumer can even download a previously purchased album for a specific journey and then remove it after listening to save space. New purchases can immediately downloaded to all devices or selectively as with the case of historical purchases. This feature definitely improves the Apple platform, and especially compared to alternate music retailers such as Amazon. 

<br /><br />Currently, Apple users can purchase songs or albums from Amazon and they will be automatically added to iTunes on the laptop, then on synchronization the songs transfer to the iPhone or iPad. Previously, buying songs through the Amazon store on the PC was as simple as buying through the Apple iTunes store, and Amazon has been slowly gaining market share in music downloads, because it competes on price and often offers songs cheaper than in the Apple iTunes store. Now, with "iTunes in the Cloud", Amazon may still be able to beat Apple iTunes Store on price, but the user experience is now deficient.

<br /><br />We seriously doubt that Apple will allow 3rd party retailers access to their iTunes in the Cloud service, and argue that Apple is using their platform to improve the position of their retail arm compared to 3rd parties.

<br /><br /><img alt="iCloudios 4 - iTunes Match June 2011.jpg" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%204%20-%20iTunes%20Match%20June%202011.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="249" width="374" />The other service offered, iTunes Match, also adds incredible value to the platform. Apple has negotiated a deal with the major record labels to offer the opportunity to consumers to add tracks from their collections not purchased via the Apple store to the iTunes in the Cloud service for a cost of $25/year. Reputedly, Apple is sharing this revenue 70:30 with the record labels and as a paid a huge advance of US$100m-US$150m for the USA rights alone. Apple has set the benchmark price for cloud music licensing and has set the bar so high that it is hard to see new entrants having sufficient funding to gain similar licenses. Even Amazon or Google will be questioning whether they can generate enough money from music to justify the price of the licenses. 
<br /><br />At the launch event, Steve Jobs presented the use-case of customers who had ripped their physical CDs. The more discussed use-case in the media is those people who have obtained their songs from illegal means, either via P2P networks or friend sharing, who effectively now have a US$25/annum service which legitimizes not only their past behaviour, but potentially also their future behaviour.  The third use-case is people who buy cheaper digital music from other digital retailers, e.g. Amazon, and now have an option to pay an ongoing fee to add the simplicity of the iTunes in the Cloud service.  Effectively, the usability advantage of the Apple platform is priced at US$25/annum which means this use-case only makes sense to heavy ongoing purchasers of music.
<br /><br />Apple didn't face the same licensing issue from the publishers and has added a very similar service for all Books bought from the iBookstore with the added feature of bookmarks are synchronized and shared across devices.
Overall, Apple has built very compelling cloud services for music, books and magazines and erected larger barriers for its competitors. If iMessage show Apple leveraging interconnected with other networks when it suits them, iTunes and iBookstore show Apple adding features which not only make interconnect more difficult for other companies, but firmly closing previously open doors.
<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><b>3. Notifications - Apple robs Windows Phone and Android advantage</b></font><br /><br /><img alt="iCloudios 5 - notifications June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%205%20-%20notifications%20June%202011.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="274" width="500" />A notification is the mechanism that consumers are alerted to events - for instance, an incoming email or sms. It is the key mechanism that 3rd party developers communicate with their users - for instance, in a sports application a notification can alert the user that their football team has scored a goal. Apple has completely revamped their notifications user experience with the addition of a notifications centre. <br /><br />Apple have pushed over 100 billion notifications to iPhone and iPad which presumably partly accounts for the high consumption of signaling capacity which many mobile operators have been complaining about. 

<br /><br />It also shows that Apple is quick to address deficiencies in their platform compared to others. This is a key feature of platform economics; you have to invest sometimes to play catch-up. 
It also highlights the risks for developers of building solutions which address platform weaknesses - yesterday's successful application is tomorrow inbuilt into the platform. <br /><br />Interestingly, an alternate notification application was never approved by Apple in their AppStore and instead went into the wilds of only being available on jailbroken iPhones. Apple new notification centre bears a striking resemblance to the non-approved one.

<img alt="iCloudios 6 - notifications June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%206%20-%20notifications%20June%202011.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="249" width="500" />

Another example of this approach is with the feature for reminders, where a plethora of applications were already being sold in the Application store. Apple added a feature called Reminders which is part of the initial application load, and which effectively destroys the market for 3rd party applications. 

This in some ways looks like a repeat of the Microsoft strategy with Windows and Internet Explorer which got them in such trouble with regulators across the globe.

<br /><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><br /></font><strong><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;">4. MacOS Software - Apple shuts out other retailers
</font><br /><br /></strong><blockquote><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%207%20-%20Mac%20OS%20Lion%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 7 - Mac OS Lion June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%207%20-%20Mac%20OS%20Lion%20June%202011-thumb-499x479-183.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="479" width="499" /></a></blockquote>The price of the new release of MacOS (aka Lion) was announced as $29.99.
 
For the customer this appears as a bargain as previous major MacOS releases were priced at $129 - a huge saving. Basic economics say the lower the price, the higher the demand which is reflected in the price elasticity curve for the product. Apple will know the shape of the curve from the previous minor release, Snow Leopard, which also retailed for $29.99, and therefore will have a good idea of the effect on overall revenues.
<br /><br />Apple also made Lion only available from the MacStore as a download. For independent software retailers, such as Amazon, this is a disaster as they no longer will be able to retail the product. Effectively, Apple has firmly closed the door for other distributors and in future will only sell software direct to the consumer. This can only increase Apple margins in the future.

<br /><br />One area of Apple excellence which is rarely mentioned elsewhere is its mastery of the supply chain and with software distribution we have a classic example of how Apple simplifies to improve profitability. Effectively, Apple has now radically cut the cost of production of CDs, product packaging and distribution. For sure, Apple has lowered prices for its operating systems, but at the same time it has radically altered the marginal costs. Apple just has to pay the payment processing fees and very small amount for content delivery - we'd be surprised if they average out much beyond $0.75 for each copy.

<br /><br />Of course, the largest cost element in operating systems is all in the intellectual effort involved in developing them and once released these development costs become a sunk cost as the team moves onto new projects. For new hardware purchases, Apple has bundled the cost of operating system with the hardware sales price.

<br /><br />A corollary effect of the Lion pricing is a potentially huge knock on effect in the Windows dominated PC world. If Apple prices its software so low, then shouldn't Microsoft also price its Windows operating System similarly?  The recent Windows7 retail price is US$120 and available through a plethora of distributors. It will be interesting to see the reaction from Microsoft.

<br /><br />In summary:
	<br /><ul><li>Apple has added a lot of value to the consumer
	</li><li>They have squeezed value from the independent software distributors
	</li><li>They have created pressure on their major OS competitor, Microsoft Windows.</li><ul>
</ul></ul>
<font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><strong>5. Newsstand - Appeasing Publishers (to a degree)
</strong></font>
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%208%20-%20Apple%20Newsstand%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 8 - Apple Newsstand June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%208%20-%20Apple%20Newsstand%20June%202011-thumb-452x302-185.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="302" width="452" /></a>Apple has created a new NewsStand application which is the digital equivalent of the street corner vendors of newspapers and magazines. For Newspaper and Magazine publishers, the new NewsStand store seems to add extra value for subscribers from the Apple community. It has been well played out in the media how the major publishers were unhappy with 30% commission that Apple required - and it is not a great strategy to upset Publishers. 
<br /><br />The appeasement strategy was twofold:<br />&nbsp;<br /><ul><li>add extra value to Publishers with their own unique space in the NewsStand with automatic background downloads to subscriptions to all consumer devices; and
</li><li>not requiring a 30% commission for subscriptions which have been purchased outside of the ecosystem.
</li></ul>Still this strategy was not enough to appease all - the Financial Times have built their own HTML5 application which is downloaded outside of Apple's control and therefore doesn't require commission to be paid. It will be fascinating to see how others will use HTML5 to navigate the Apple 30% commissions.
<br /><br />Overall, the main lesson from this subscription saga is that in platform economics it is vital to be flexible with partners. Appeasement doesn't necessarily mean conceding on pricing, but can entail adding special features to help them.
<br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;">6. MobileMe - just 'making it work' ... and building the moat
</font><br /></b><div><br /><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%209%20-%20Apple%20mobileme%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 9 - Apple mobileme June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%209%20-%20Apple%20mobileme%20June%202011-thumb-482x322-187.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="322" width="482" /></a>The Digital Entertainment 2.0 team is fascinated by the evolution of mail services, because:<br /><br /><ul><li>they are usually free to the end-user and therefore open up two-sided business models, such as the funding of Google Gmail by advertisers;
</li><li>they are usually costly to operate consuming large quantities of storage, having expensive teams fighting a nuclear arms race with the spammers, dealing with complex identity management issues, and dealing with a lot of governments wanting to pry on the activities of their citizens; </li><li>
the mail platforms have subtle modes of interconnect which allow for differentiation with certain add-on features e.g. meeting requests; and
</li><li>Telcos gave up the fight many years ago and nowadays leave the services to others.
</li></ul>The first Cloud service announced at the WWDC event was the complete rewrite, repricing and repositioning of the MobileMe (Contacts, Calendar and Mail) service. We assume rewrite because the original MobileMe service was noted for its unreliability and even Steve Jobs admits "that it was not Apple's finest hour". The price has also been cut from $99/year to free. But the intriguing piece was the repositioning as Steve Jobs stated that "Apple loves mail, especially the variety without adverts" which we took as a direct dig at both Google Gmail and the Microsoft Live products.
<br /><br />One of the ongoing design strategies that Apple uses is simplifying its products and streamlining its internal processes. The net impact is to remove a barrier to adoption and acquisition and improve retention by making one more feature simpler, cheaper and easier to use.
<br /><br />The economics of the new mail service look to be based on customer retention as Apple is adding costs to their platform without any obvious direct or indirect means of monetization. Mail is one of most important features that people use of any connected platform and Mail creates 'stickiness' to a platform making it harder for platform users to churn. So, if a consumer has an Apple mail service and wants to move another platform, such as Android or Windows Phone, and that platform doesn't offer MobileMe features, MobileMe alone could possibly prevent churn. It also helps that MobileMe negates the advantages of the competition.
<br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><br /></font><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><b>7. iCloud and Video Services - holding fire for now
</b></font><br /><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%2010%20-%20Apple%20Video%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 10 - Apple Video June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%2010%20-%20Apple%20Video%20June%202011-thumb-500x384-189.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="384" width="500" /></a>Apple announced cloud services for many forms of text, graphics and audio. But the 'heavy duty' content form of video was missing. At first glance this might be surprising given that Apple is a major retailer of films and TV through its iTunes store. We think there are four possible reasons for the exclusion of video.
<br /><br /><b>i) Conservatism</b>
<br /><br />After the debacle with MobileMe, the pressure is now on Apple to deliver reliable Cloud services. Video services require far more infrastructure heavy lifting than other forms of content. The size of a 90 minute video is around 4GB, whereas the average album is around 500MB and an average book barely stretches beyond 5MB. Apple may have delayed the release of video cloud services until their infrastructure and capabilities is fully tested with lighter loads.
<br /><br /><b>ii) Network Charges to the end-User
<br /></b><br />The impact of consumers moving lots of content between Apple devices and the cloud is uncertain, both in terms of data consumption and resulting charges to the consumer. This raises the real possibility that in the era of tiered data plans, Apple consumers could start racking up large overage charges to the mobile operators.  We suspect that Apple will want to closely monitor the network consumption patterns, especially the ratio between WiFi and 3G networks, before launching the capability to move the fat video files. The last thing that Apple will want is an increase in the share of their customers' wallets being passed to the mobile operators.
<br /><br /><b>iii) Competition
</b><br /><br />The <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_DECE-Ultraviolet-2011_Summary">launch of UltraViolet as a consumer proposition</a> is expected in the 2nd half of 2011. This is a big initiative planned by the Movie Studios promoting the ownership of digital copies of movies which has been several years in germination. Apple is the major tech company not included in the consortium. Apple will probably want to see the initial Ultraviolet launch and consumer adoption, before they build their service. After all, Apple is rarely first to market.
<br /><br /><b>iv) Platform Evolution
<br /></b><br />Successful platforms grow in features year-on-year making them both more attractive to consumers and improving the overall economics. <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_Amazon-2-four-levels-transformation_Summary">Werner Vogel, Amazon's CTO, described this process as creating as a 'flywheel' of platform economic momentum</a> which makes it harder and harder for competitors to match and creating barriers to entry to new entrants. We have no doubt that video cloud services are on the Apple roadmap and are probably of such importance that they could constitute a major platform upgrade all on their own. 
<br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;">8. Activation - Cutting the PC cord
</font><br /></b><br /><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%2011%20-%20Apple%20Video%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 11 - Apple Video June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%2011%20-%20Apple%20Video%20June%202011-thumb-356x268-191.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="268" width="356" /></a>Apple completely rewrote the book on phone activation when the original iPhone was launched in 2007. Although cumbersome to the consumer compared to traditional phone activation, it offered certain features in return such as the ability to synchronize iTunes collections and automatic backup. But, by far the biggest beneficiary was the Apple platform as they gained a direct relationship with the consumer.  Moving on to today and the activation process look even more cumbersome especially compared to the competition.
<br /><br />So to great fanfare and jubilation, Apple announced they were cutting the cord to the PC-based activation (without actually demoing the new activation process). Obviously, if executed correctly, this will eliminate a key competitive disadvantage with iOS, but there is more to the move than at first glance.
<br /><br /><b>i) It Reduces Customer Care cost.
</b><br /><br />Only about 50% of people ever reconnect their iPhone to the PC after the initial activation process. This means the vast the majority were never completing essential administration tasks such as backing up their phone or updating the underlying operating system with new iOS releases which are not all new features, but also bug fixes. The move of the activation and update process to the Cloud means that a bigger proportion of iPhones will be running the same version of iOS - and this will make Apple support far easier. 
<br /><br /><b>ii) Households can substitute PCs with iPads.
</b><br /><br />Microsoft Windows based PC's dominate the market share in the home. Apple probably calculates that a certain percentage of home users don't want a PC in the home and their needs can be met with an iPad alone. Although removing the necessity for a PC will cannibalize some Mac sales these will be replaced with iPad sales, whereas for Microsoft Windows and its OEMs the PC sale is not replaced by alternate revenues. 
Improving platform economics is all about a series of small steps - either improving the proposition to small micro-segments, such as those people who want to replace their PC, or improving the cost, such as taking tiny fractions off the operating costs.
<br /><b><br />iii) Reduces Friction in buying new hardware
</b><br /><br />Apple has also placed the AppStore in the cloud which means all the purchase history of the applications is stored in the cloud - this includes all the settings. This effectively means that swapping to a new iteration of the iPhone or iPad is much easier with all the previous content and setting immediately available for synchronization.  As much of the value of the Apple platform resides is selling new hardware removing obstacles for existing users is extremely important.
<br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><br /></font><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><b>9. Photo Stream - yes, but why?
</b></font><br /><br /><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%2012%20-%20Apple%20PhotoStream%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 12 - Apple PhotoStream June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%2012%20-%20Apple%20PhotoStream%20June%202011-thumb-352x232-193.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="232" width="352" /></a>Apple also announced a photo distribution cloud service called PhotoStream, which currently has the Digital Entertainment 2.0 team scratching our heads. The main feature is that any picture taken with an iPhone or iPad will be distributed (over WiFi) to all other owned Apple devices. e.g. Laptop or AppleTV. The iPhone and iPad store the last 1,000 photos, the laptop stores all photos and the iCloud stores photos from the last 30 days. So why do we think this new service is strange?<br /><br /><ol><li>Most of the photos the team takes are rubbish and the first attempt is rejected and has to be retaken. So why would Apple want to automatically distribute all photos taken to all devices? The cynics among us think the only rational reason is eat storage and move the day of buying new iPad and IPhone (with larger storage) closer. With a 5 megapixel camera each photo taken with the iPhone4 consumes 2MB, therefore a 1,000 photo library consumes approximates 2GB.
</li><li>Acceptable photos are then quite often sent to friends and family. iMessage will perform this task admirably at zero cost if the recipients are also Apple users; </li><li>There is a need to store photos in the cloud, but forever not just for 30 days. These form our digital albums which serve us when we want to relive those magical moments in life. Why would we want these to reside archived on a laptop's hard drive?
</li></ol>Our gut feel is that we not alone in our puzzlement, and Photostream will not be a great asset to the Apple platform, though we welcome any blinding flashes of inspiration from our readers.
<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><b>10. Data Centre Economics - making a start
</b></font><br /><br /><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%2013%20-%20Apple%20Data%20Centre%20June%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 13 - Apple Data Centre June 2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%2013%20-%20Apple%20Data%20Centre%20June%202011-thumb-500x344-195.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="344" width="500" /></a>In previous notes, we've explained the <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/EB_How-to-deal-with-google_Summary">competitive cost advantage that Google has in its Data Centre infrastructure</a>. Google takes a completely vertically integrated approach from owning the buildings and fibre connecting them to designing the hardware and operating systems that run within them. Recently, Google has even taken the extreme measure of buying its own eco-friendly power generating capabilities.
<br /><br />We don't believe Apple will be anywhere near Google on its cost curve. First of all, data centre economics is a scale business and currently Apple only operates three datacentres in the US and none in Western Europe or Asia. Secondly, Apple seem to be using third parties for its processing and storage (HP servers and TeraData storage were pictured). 
<br /><br />Obviously, this is a start of a long journey for Apple and we imagine years of cost optimization efforts for Apple in improving the unit costs of their data centre operations.
<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.5625em;"><b>Summary of main platform economics lessons
</b></font><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><br /></font><br /><a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/iCloudios%2014%20-%20apple%20google%20microsoft%20june%20%202011.png"><img alt="iCloudios 14 - apple google microsoft june  2011.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/assets_c/2011/06/iCloudios%2014%20-%20apple%20google%20microsoft%20june%20%202011-thumb-300x116-197.png" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" height="116" width="300" /></a>Platforms need constant investment to continually expand with new features which at a minimum keep up with the competition. These new features continually raise the bar and investment required for new entrants. <br /><br />Platform owners also need to decide where the doors are allowing interconnection to some services and closing access to others. Platform owners also add features which drive value to their monetization point (in Apple's case hardware sales) and away from other source in the value chain which create value for others (in Apple's case aggregators and distributors).<br /><br />In this respect, Apple is no different from other platform owners, whether Google, Microsoft, Amazon, or Facebook.&nbsp;</div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>YouView: the future of British TV or another Domesday Project?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/06/youview-the-future-of-british-tv-or-another-domesday-project.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.996</id>

    <published>2011-06-10T16:32:16Z</published>
    <updated>2011-06-16T15:00:09Z</updated>

    <summary>In which Digital Entertainment 2.0 reviews the YouView specifications Delegates at the recent Digital Entertainment 2.0 events would have seen a fascinating couple of sessions on future TV. Will we (as LG suggested) have multi-screen TVs, with screens dedicated to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Harrowell</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=7</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Online Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Really Big Websites" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br /><em>In which Digital Entertainment 2.0 reviews the YouView specifications</em></p>

<p>Delegates at the recent <a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/events/">Digital Entertainment 2.0 events</a> would have seen a fascinating couple of sessions on future TV. Will we (as LG suggested) have multi-screen TVs, with screens dedicated to high definition video, meta-data, and to social content? Or will the role of "social TV" be fulfilled by an independent "companion device", as former YouView CTO Anthony Rose suggested?</p>

<p><em>[Ed: There's more on these themes in our recent <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_YouTube-change-game_Full">YouTube: Recent Improvements Change the Game</a> note and our new analysis on <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_DECE-Ultraviolet-2011_Summary">UltraViolet</a>,the content industry's answer to iCloud and Amazon Cloud Drive</a>]</em></p>

<p>On the other hand, as we've been saying for years, the move of mass-audience TV onto the Internet is constantly testing the technologies and business models involved. Even if the growth rates are not as ferocious as first predicted, they are still higher than overall traffic and the content itself is getting higher quality. How will we push all those packets?</p>

<p>In the UK, whenever there has been a technology transition in broadcasting, there has always been one institution that has acted as a leader - the BBC. Its great rival in this has to be BSkyB - think of Sky+, Sky HD, and Sky 3D. On the BBC's side, there's decades of work in the core trades of TV, developing the basic infrastructure, pioneering TV on the Web with the iPlayer, and some interesting side projects like the BBC Micro. The two of them have contrasting and perhaps complementary specialities - as the pay-TV challenger, Sky is fascinated by adding more features to TV, while the BBC as a public service is all about infrastructure and universal reach. When a little-known Racal division called Vodafone needed a radio planner to build their GSM network, they poached John Causebrook straight out of BBC Research.</p>

<p>After much tortuous negotiating with the regulators and the other TV stations, they have finally got a specification out for a common platform for the next generation of STBs, YouView. If it gets deployed, it will shape the future - so is it any good?</p>

<p>Digital Entertainment 2.0 recently had to make a long train journey, so we grabbed the <a href="http://www.youview.com/industry/wp-content/themes/youview/_site_media/resources/YouView_Core_Technical_Specification_1.0.pdf">229-page technical specification</a> and got stuck into it.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<h2>The Good Points</h2>

<p>This spec is basically sensible and that's always preferable to the alternatives. It describes a low-power, media-optimised Linux device based on well understood, widely used open-source software. </p>

<p>Best of all, the spec is sound on networking. YouView intends to tackle the problem of dumping enormous quantities of video on the UK's creaky copper-line infrastructure in the following ways:</p>

<ol>
    <li>CDN the hell out of it</li>
        <li>Adapt to the limitations</li>
        <li>Shave the peaks</li>
        <li>Integrate broadcast and broadband</li>
        <li>Multicast everything</li>
</ol>

<p>We already knew, of course, that a big part of YouView would be BT's spanking new content delivery network, Content Connect. CDNing is a well-tried and reliable way to deliver video without blowing things up. So the point at which the firehose of telly pouring out of the BBC gets turned on the ISPs is pushed well towards the end user.</p>

<p>Perhaps that's not enough, though. This is one of the reasons why an intelligent STB is useful in itself. YouView intends to obviate the idea of throttling or deep-packet inspecting streams of video by managing them itself from the network edge. The specification requires that the video bitrate adapt to the available bandwidth - the BBC iPlayer client already does this and manages to fit live streaming Rugby League onto the 400 or so Kbps Digital Entertainment 2.0 enjoys in the wilds of remotest north London.</p>

<p>Self-managing the flow of video is a theme in the whole project. The specification requires that YouView devices provide several edge-defined traffic classes - the highest being for live streaming, the lowest being a scavenger-class for downloads that uses all bandwidth left over after other flows are satisfied and gets out of the way otherwise. </p>

<p>The mention of downloads should remind us that a big part of dealing with online video distribution is what we described as peak-shaving, borrowing a term from the electricity grid. Much more load can be handled if some of it is shifted from the peak hour to the rest of the day when spare capacity exists. This is especially important as wholesale bandwidth is typically charged for by peak utilisation (the famous 95th percentile). YouView intends to queue much of the heavy content ahead of time and stash it on the device's local hard disk.</p>

<p>The spec also foresees the integration of broadcast and broadband - a substantial chunk of the disk is reserved for content pushed out by broadcasters and stored locally. Clearly, this is one way of keeping Coronation Street off the Internet and on the airwaves, where it belongs.</p>

<p>Finally, the specification requires IP multicast to be on by default. BT has <a href="http://www.telco2.net/blog/2011/05/china_has_reached_900_million.html#multimulticast">recently announced</a> that at long last their backbone network is going to be multicast enabled, and in fact they're incorporating it into Content Connect. Multicasting essentially makes every router into a CDN node, drastically reducing the volume of data that has to be moved over the whole end-to-end path. Somebody has to originate the multicast streams and count the viewers, and BT is going to be offering this as a wholesale service.</p>

<p>Moving on from the packet pushing side - and we find everything seems a little dull after you leave the networking stuff behind - YouView also foresees that there will be apps for the system. Being a full-featured Linux device based on consensus technology, there will be no shortage of potential developers for it, especially as its web browser is WebKit. But we aren't completely sure about the distribution model.</p>

<h2>The Worse Points</h2>

<p>It's not surprising that a specification drawn up by TV channels would tend to give TV channels a special role. YouView foresees three kinds of apps.</p>

<ol>
    <li>Core YouView</li>
        <li>Platform Provider</li>
        <li>Content Provider</li>
</ol>

<p>The core YouView system is what it says on the tin, plus any applications the device manufacturer wants to include. The Platform Provider is the party responsible for YouView itself, for the electronic programming guide, for a variety of crucial approval and cryptographic signing processes, probably for the broadcast infrastructure, and is very likely to be the BBC. Among other things, the PP signs Content Providers' keys that allow them to publish software that gets installed on the YouView STB. It's possible that a pioneer device maker might take on the role of PP for their own devices, but the specification gives the strong impression that there will be only one.</p>

<p><img alt="youviewsystem.png" src="http://www.telco2.net/blog/images/youviewsystem.png" width="670" height="747" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>So, to a first approximation, you've got to be a TV station to get your app in the app store. Further, this quote from the spec should stand in its own right: </p>

<blockquote><em>Chapter VI Consumer Device Software Management. This chapter is not relevant to application developers</em></blockquote>

<p>Really? How could the process of getting your application out to the public and onto their machines <em>not</em> be relevant to application developers?</p>

<p>Obviously, there's a possibility that one of the TV stations would decide to set up an app store that would facilitate the process. Our money would be on Channel 4 - they already invest in a variety of digital projects including <a href="http://www.scraperwiki.com/">ScraperWiki</a>.</p>

<p>But there's another problem here. YouView hopes to be the centre of all your TV and video content, whether it's sideloaded from DVDs, downloaded or streamed from the Internet, or broadcast over the air and stored locally. But the fraction of this content that comes from a traditional TV station, however it gets to you, is falling all the time. Can YouTube be a YouView channel? Would it get code-signing rights?</p>

<p>There are ways round this. One, described above, is that a content provider would act as a proxy for independent developers. Another would be to do it all in the browser - the specification states that an AppPlayer object (the base type for a running application) can be a web browser. As we mentioned above, the browser is WebKit, which should provide plenty of scope, especially as a lot of web developers are intimately familiar with it from the iPhone.</p>

<p>More fundamentally, the user interface paradigm is very, very TV-centric. You wouldn't expect anything else from TV channels, of course. But the specification insists that the user interacts with the system through a classic TV remote control handset. It's very explicit about this.</p>

<p>Obviously, support for the remote is a must - there are public service obligations to think about and a lot of deep expectations and legacy kit to deal with. But what if you wanted to control the system - which gives you a <em>lot</em> more options and far richer forms of interaction than a TV remote - from your laptop or mobile device? </p>

<p>Even more importantly, what if you wanted to use your Kinect or Nintendo Wii or the accelerometer in your iPhone to do something genuinely exciting with it? All sorts of things are happening in this line right now. Even Microsoft has managed to make its peace with the Kinect hackers. And even Nokia's doing interesting stuff with TV, video, and gesture interfaces...</p>

<p><object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/omX1wbQiQ2c?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/omX1wbQiQ2c?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object></p>

<p>But if you want to do it with YouView, you're missing an API that lets you drive the user interface with something other than the classic IR remote you lose down the back of the sofa. Why isn't there a Web service API for this? In fact, why isn't there a user script API, the equivalent of Firefox add-ons for television?</p>

<p>Finally, we have some concerns about the networking side. When we've thought about broadcast-broadband integration, we've always worked on the principle that as much stuff as possible should travel over the broadcast system. Broadcast, whether satellite or terrestrial, does one thing well - moving hit content in high quality, cheaply.</p>

<p>But we're struggling to see the use of the Push-VOD over IP functionality in YouView. The TV infrastructure broadcasts a list of available programmes, and the user device requests something from the list over the Internet. Isn't this upside down? The metadata, a text file, is travelling on the broadcast link, while hundreds of megabytes of video are travelling over the Internet. It's worth remembering that Virgin Media never bothered with Push VOD and Sky has tried it and changed their mind in more recent iterations of Sky+ - also, YouView foresees that the device might automatically pick out content predictively, based on observed usage or on user-specified criteria, which doesn't make any sense at all with Push VOD.</p>

<p>However, in the light of the BT multicast announcement, we may have been too dogmatic about this. Apparently, BT originally didn't do multicast because they were primarily thinking in terms of supporting their BT Vision IPTV product, and they hoped to move much of the video involved over the UK DTT broadcast infrastructure. Now, BT has got a lot more live streaming video to shift - they've succeeded in getting wholesale access to Sky's football coverage. They've also got to think in terms of YouView and in terms of preparation for the 2012 Olympics and associated Global Packet Pushers' Pentathlon. (London 2012 is likely to be a key driver of YouView.)</p>

<p>And it seems that they've decided that the additional DTT multiplex capacity would cost more than the IP multicast. This is an odd blow-back from the mobile video traffic boom - people started really using mobile data, the carriers lobbied frantically for more spectrum, and they won the lobbying war and got the additional spectrum ahead of TV. You pays your money, and you takes your choice, but it's worth pointing that the original multicast concept foresaw <em>global</em> content distribution and it provides for some interesting future possibilities.</p>

<p>Further, as the spec stands, it doesn't let you cache anything that was delivered over an SSL-encrypted link due to DRM issues. It is likely that most things on the Web will be SSL before long. This is a bug.</p>

<h2>Digital Entertainment 2.0 Final Thoughts...</h2>

<p>Our conclusion is, essentially, "Good - as far as it goes". YouView has obviously benefited from the work of network engineers with Internet clue, and is a fine and regrettably rare example of the content industry not finding ways to make everything more complicated. It represents an intelligent response to the online video challenge, and incorporates many of the approaches that we recommended in 2007-2008 as the BBC iPlayer revved up to disrupt the UK Internet.</p>

<p>It's another reminder that, if you're looking for the "British Google", it's BBC Internet Services. However, there's another, darker story here - that of a whole lineage of interesting, elegant British tech projects that didn't really happen. The classic case is the BBC's <a href="http://www.atsf.co.uk/dottext/domesday.html">Domesday Project</a>, a massive crowdsourcing exercise from the 1980s that eventually just ended up in a filing cabinet at Broadcasting House. More recently, another BBC idea, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_%28video_on_demand%29">Project Kangaroo</a>, hoped to create a public archive of the UK's TV history but failed miserably amid rancorous disputes between the partners.</p>

<p>As the surprisingly close choice between more broadcast and IP multicast shows, it really is a question of crafting the right digital logistics package for the job. YouView provides a lot of useful options</p>

<p>However, whether any of this actually helps depends on end user adoption and the quality of the products supporting YouView as a standard. And we're seriously concerned that the TV-centric thinking behind YouView is going to cripple it as a platform for innovation. For example, we doubt that the notion of a TV "channel" will mean much, and especially that anyone will get software from one. </p>

<p>It's also going to be critical to get the content providers of the future in there. YouTube is obvious (again, are they going to become a UK TV station?) but there's Ultraviolet and Lovefilm to think about.</p>

<p>Also, will people really interact with a future "social", "connected", or "smart" TV through the classic, nine button remote control? For the first time, the percentage of households with a TV at all is <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=149737&nid=126336">shrinking</a>. This is a critical issue - we don't actually know if future TV will be delivered by something that even looks like a TV. Clearly there's going to be a big display of some sort, but beyond that it's anyone's guess. Baking the remote into the system tends to enforce a TV-like design and a TV-like interaction pattern.</p>

<p>The danger is that YouView is too much like TheyView - a project inextricably linked to a media model with not much of a future, doomed to join Concorde, the Domesday Project, and much else in the halls of the Science Museum. </p>

<p>It's not foredoomed - it's not certain. But there is a serious risk that it will go that way. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Can Amazon Building an Online Distribution Platform to Rival Apple and Google?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/03/amazon-building-an-online-distribution-platform-to-challenge-apple-and-google.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.965</id>

    <published>2011-03-25T11:57:37Z</published>
    <updated>2011-03-28T13:44:21Z</updated>

    <summary>Summary: Amazon is probably the Internet&apos;s best retailer. As it launches its own AppStore, we provide a detailed analysis of its digital media business and pick out the key opportunities it offers to content owners, network service providers and device...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Catherine Haslam</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=11</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Online Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="amazon" label="Amazon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="amazonkindle" label="Amazon Kindle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="appstore" label="AppStore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="digitaldownload" label="Digital download" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="digitalmedia" label="Digital media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="digitalmusic" label="digital music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="digitalstreaming" label="digital streaming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ebooks" label="e-books" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ipad" label="IPad" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="onlinegames" label="online games" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tabletcomputer" label="Tablet computer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="left"><strong><em>Summary: <font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon is probably the Internet's best retailer. As it launches its own AppStore, we provide a detailed analysis of its digital media business and pick out the key opportunities it offers to content owners, network service providers and device manufacturers</font>.</em></strong></p>
<h1 style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;"><font color="#000000" size="2">For Amazon, the world of downloading and streaming brings both threats and opportunities: threats in that a large proportion of its current business is at risk of being cannibalised; and opportunities in that a significant element of its cost base associated with the storing, shipping, picking and packing of physical goods could be automated and reduced further. </font></h1>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon's key strengths are the size of its customer base; its ongoing relationships with all the major content owners in all the key categories (Books, Music, Movies/TV and Games); and most importantly, Amazon is the most highly skilled retailer on the Internet. Amazon's Achilles heel is that it has very little control over next generation devices, apart from the Kindle, whether Tablet or Mobile phone.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In this note, we examine:</font></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon's current performance;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The rising costs of physical distribution;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The attraction of online distribution (streaming and downloading) to Amazon;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The success of the Kindle;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Why Amazon has failed to gain significant market share in music;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The rationale behind the move into movie streaming;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">How Amazon will shake up the AppStore market; </font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Whether the success of the Kindle means a move into more own-brand devices;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon's potential impact on the digital value ecosystem and how content owners, networks and device manufacturers should interact with Amazon.</font></div></li></ul>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><a href="editor-content.html?cs=utf-8" name="_Toc288814061"></a><strong>Amazon's Current Performance</strong></h2>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon's Operating Income in 2010 was $1.4bn with a typically low retail sector margin of 4.1%. This is a far lower margin than usually sought by the content industry, networks or the device industry and one of Amazon's key strategic advantages - its investors do not expect huge margins. However, they do expect revenue growth, and this it has delivered so far (see below) through the development of the most advanced retail platform on the Internet, fierce price competition, tight control over costs and increasing product diversification.</font></h2>
<p style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;" align="center"><em>Figure 1: Amazon Operates with the Low Margins Typical of Retail</em></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Narrow','sans-serif'; font-size: 11pt;"><strong><font size="3"><font color="#597eb8"><em><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"><v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"></v:path><o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"></o:lock></v:shapetype><v:shape style="width: 469.5pt; height: 388.5pt; visibility: visible;" id="Chart_x0020_3" o:spid="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" o:gfxdata="UEsDBBQABgAIAAAAIQDVHvRgEwEAAKECAAATAAAAW0NvbnRlbnRfVHlwZXNdLnhtbKySu07EMBBF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"><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image001.png" o:title="" cropbottom="-9f"></v:imagedata><o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="f"><font face=""><img style="width: 546px; height: 473px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon Fig 1.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20Fig%201.png" width="1238" height="968" /></font></o:lock></v:shape></em></font></font></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: right; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="2">Source: Amazon, STL Partners</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon is now the world's largest e-commerce site selling over US$34bn worth of goods and services in 2010. The Amazon main website attracts more unique visitors in a month than either eBay or Apple (see below).</font></p>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><em>Figure 2: Amazon is the Busiest Online Store in the World</em></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Narrow','sans-serif'; font-size: 11pt;"><strong><font size="3"><font color="#597eb8"><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"><v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"></v:path><o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"></o:lock></v:shapetype><v:shape style="width: 468pt; height: 150.75pt; visibility: visible;" id="Picture_x0020_4" o:spid="_x0000_i1033" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="amazon-com-apple-com-ebay-com_uv_1y.png"><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image001.png" o:title="amazon-com-apple-com-ebay-com_uv_1y"><img style="width: 572px; height: 192px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 2.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%202.png" width="938" height="304" /></v:imagedata></v:shape></font></font></strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">At the end of 2010, Amazon had over 130m 'active' customer accounts, a healthy increase of over 25 million in the year. In comparison Apple has over 200m accounts with credit cards stored - but does not break-out the percentage of these that are actually buying goods and services from it. It is therefore difficult to determine whether Amazon or Apple have the most paying customers passing through their stores. Whichever is the larger, Amazon's retail prowess cannot be ignored, especially in entertainment media where its revenues continue to grow year-on-year. </font></p>
<h3 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 3pt;">Amazon's Media Sales</h3>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon's roots are in selling books but over the years its portfolio has been extended successfully to other type of physical media so that its media category now comprises Books, Music, Movies, Video Games and Consoles, Software and Digital Downloads in most territories (USA, Canada, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan and China).<span>&nbsp; </span>The sales associated with its media business are still growing by over 10% per annum and, although declining as a percentage of total sales, still represented over 43% of total net sales in 2010. The reduction in percentage of total sales is therefore more a reflection of Amazon's success in its diversified product range than any drop off in media. </font></p>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><em>Figure 3: Amazon's media sales are still growing at over 10% per annum</em></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Narrow','sans-serif'; font-size: 11pt;"><v:shape style="width: 469.5pt; height: 345pt; visibility: visible;" id="_x0000_i1032" type="#_x0000_t75" o:gfxdata="UEsDBBQABgAIAAAAIQDVHvRgEwEAAKECAAATAAAAW0NvbnRlbnRfVHlwZXNdLnhtbKySu07EMBBF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"><font size="3"><font color="#597eb8"><em><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image002.png" o:title="" cropbottom="-48f"></v:imagedata><o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="f"><font color="#333333" face=""><img style="width: 494px; height: 433px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 3.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%203.png" width="1238" height="922" /></font></o:lock></em></font></font></v:shape></span></p>
<p style="text-align: right; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="2">Source: Amazon, STL Partners</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">It is noteworthy that Amazon doesn't provide any further detail on the media category and therefore little is known outside of Amazon about how their customers' habits are changing from physical media consumption to digital. However, Amazon has been very clear that it sees a future where media is consumed both physically and digitally. In short, it wants to grow the entire pie. Amazon is not abandoning the physical world, in much the same way that Netflix is not abandoning the mailing of DVDs.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon promotes itself to investors as growing the absolute level of Operating Income and therefore is less worried about margins than overall growth. This is important for content owners as it aligns with their priorities and means that Amazon is as concerned with cannibalisation of physical product revenues as they are. However, that does not mean Amazon is in any way anti-online distribution.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon is also highly focussed on growing Free Cash Flow per share, which implies strict management of working capital and balance sheet expenditure. To understand the appeal of online business in this context, we first have to understand the costs and cost trends associated with physical products.</font></p>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><strong>Counting the Cost of Physical Distribution</strong></h2>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon currently spends about US$1.4bn or 4% of revenues on the physical shipping of goods to its customers. Despite Amazon's famed distribution efficiency, this percentage has increased over the last couple of years, eating ever further beyond the associated shipping revenues, as illustrated below.</font></p>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><em>Figure 4: Amazon's Net Shipping Costs Continue to Rise Over and Above P&amp;P CHarges to Consumers</em></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span><v:shape style="width: 469.5pt; height: 381pt; visibility: visible;" id="Chart_x0020_1" o:spid="_x0000_i1031" type="#_x0000_t75" o:gfxdata="UEsDBBQABgAIAAAAIQDVHvRgEwEAAKECAAATAAAAW0NvbnRlbnRfVHlwZXNdLnhtbKySu07EMBBF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"><font size="3"><font color="#597eb8"><em><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image003.png" o:title=""></v:imagedata><o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="f"><font color="#333333"><img style="width: 542px; height: 519px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon Fig 4.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20Fig%204.png" width="1238" height="960" /></font></o:lock></em></font></font></v:shape></span></p>
<p style="text-align: right; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="2">Source: Amazon, STL Partners</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">This is probably down to two factors:</font></p>
<ol>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon offers an annual "Prime" shipping service where for a fixed annual shipping commitment, customers receive "free" shipping for each purchase. It is estimated that 15% of Amazon customers are "Prime" subscribers. It is assumed that "Prime" customers are more loyal to Amazon and are their heavier spenders; and</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has moved into selling more bulky goods over the years, such as PCs, which are far more expensive to ship than books.</font></div></li></ol>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Furthermore, there are additional costs associated with physical distribution.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><font color="#000000" size="2"><em>Figure 5: Physical Fulfilment Costs Remain Stable as a Percentage of Net Sales</em></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><font color="#000000" size="2"><em></em></font> <img style="width: 555px; height: 512px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 5.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%205.png" width="1238" height="884" /></p>
<p style="text-align: right; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="2">Source: Amazon, STL Partners</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="2"><font color="#000000">Amazon spent around US$2.9bn or 8.5% of revenues in 2010 on fulfilment costs (or the picking and packing) of goods. Amazon doesn't break-out how much it spends on payment processing (included within cost of goods sold) or maintaining the technology (elements include Technology and Content, Depreciation and Amortisation) for its various e-commerce sites. </font></font></p>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><strong>The Attraction of Online Distribution</strong></h2>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">With Amazon's ability to manage the combined physical costs of shipping and fulfilment to 12.5% of revenues in 2010, we believe that Amazon should be able to deliver online distribution for less than the 30% benchmark 'agency fee' revenue share typical in the online distribution model. That is before the additional efficiencies that Digital distribution offers over Physical. Therefore, the margins offered up by the digital environment are highly attractive to Amazon.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Furthermore digital goods, in the main, fit perfectly into Amazon's Operating Income growth model as the carrying cost of inventory is minimal and cash for goods is received immediately from customers, while the payment to content owners is typically disbursed 30 days after purchase. The major exception to this rule is when content owners demand large upfront fees for either access to content libraries or for exclusive deals. This is a major feature of both the Movies/TV and Music industries, and may account at least in part for the differing levels of take up Amazon has experienced between these and e-books.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">So, where does Amazon sit in online distribution - streaming and downloading? Is it a major player that needs to be actively worked with or against or can it be left out of the strategic thinking of the others in the digital online ecosystem - content owners, network service providers and device manufacturers?<span>&nbsp; </span>A closer examination of the position of Amazon in each of the major digital content categories - publishing, music, video and apps, provides valuable insight.</font></p>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><strong>The Success of the Kindle: more eBooks than Paperbacks</strong></h2>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon launched the Kindle in 2007 as an e-ink book reader for an introductory price of US$399, which in its first iteration had connectivity exclusively provided through the Sprint CDMA network. However, Amazon developed more than a hardware device with the Kindle, it built the whole surrounding ecosystem for sale, delivery and management of mainly electronic books but also other publishing media such as newspapers. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><em>Figure 6: The Amazon Kindle</em></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><img style="width: 543px; height: 290px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 6.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%206.png" width="977" height="555" /></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Today, the hardware price of the Kindle has come down to US$139 (WiFi only) to US$189 (WiFi+3G) and Amazon has launched Kindle readers across all the major platforms from Apple (Mac, iPhone and iPad), Google Android, RIM Blackberry and Microsoft (Windows and Windows Phone7). If a customer buys a book from the Kindle store, it can be read on most of the major platforms for a single fee. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon doesn't break out sales data for either Kindle or eBooks, but the following extract from Amazon's 4Q 2010 earnings release provides just an indication of progress being made.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span class="MsoIntenseEmphasis"><strong><em><font color="#3398cc"><font size="2">Amazon.com is now selling more Kindle books than paperback books. Since the beginning of the year, for every 100 paperback books Amazon has sold, the Company has sold 115 Kindle books. Additionally, during this same time period the Company has sold three times as many Kindle books as hardcover books. This is across Amazon.com's entire U.S. book business and includes sales of books where there is no Kindle edition. Free Kindle books are excluded and if included would make the numbers even higher.<o:p></o:p></font></font></em></strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span class="MsoIntenseEmphasis"><strong><em><font color="#3398cc"><font size="2">The Company sold millions of third-generation Kindle devices with the new advanced paper-like Pearl e-ink display in the fourth quarter and the third-generation Kindle eclipsed ―Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - as the best selling product in Amazon's history.<o:p></o:p></font></font></em></strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span class="MsoIntenseEmphasis"><strong><em><font color="#3398cc"><font size="2">The U.S. Kindle Store now has more than 810,000 books including New Releases and 107 of 112 New York Times Bestsellers. Over 670,000 of these books are $9.99 or less, including 74 New York Times Bestsellers. Millions of free, out-of-copyright, pre-1923 books are also available to read on Kindle.<o:p></o:p></font></font></em></strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span><font color="#000000"><font size="2">January 2011's sales figures from the American Association of Publishers also point to the growing success of eBooks - US$70m - a 116% increase year-on-year - despite a small, 1.8% (US$805m), fall in the overall market. eBook market share figures are hard to verify. Apple recently claimed 20% of the market, Barnes and Noble (US-only) also claimed 20% of the market and Amazon claims between 70% and 80% of the market - obviously not all can be true. <o:p></o:p></font></font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2"><span>Wild market claims are to be expected in this high growth stage of the market's development, and there is uncertainty whether a 20% market share is by downloads or value and whether downloads include free, out of copyright eBooks which generate no revenue. All estimates that the STL team have seen indicate that Amazon is the market leader with a market share in the 50%-75% range.</span> This </font></font><a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-18438_7-20012381-82.html"><font color="#b20f0b" size="2">CNET interview with Ian Freed</font></a><span style="color: black;"><font size="2">, an Amazon vice president in charge of the Kindle, provides more detail on where Amazon sees itself in the market.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Although detailed data isn't available about whether Amazon is yet making a contribution to operating profit from the Kindle and eBooks generally, all the indications are that Amazon is happy with the results and the continued investment speaks for itself.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The STL team believes Amazon's success can be put down to five key factors:</font></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon probably has the highest concentration of book reader users as its customers;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Reading books on the Kindle is a very pleasurable experience and much better than some non-dedicated devices, especially the PC and the phone;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has developed a very easy-to-use platform which removes the friction of purchase and delivery of eBooks to a wide choice of platforms;</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has tried to deliver great prices to its customers with new eBooks typically priced cheaper than their hardback alternatives. The Kindle Store has always included a wide selection of free out of copyright books; and</font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has built a store with access to material from the largest publishers to the smallest self-publishers. Self publishers are driving innovation with low-pricing for smaller episodic books.</font></div></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The STL team believes that this last point is extremely important. Currently, Amazon has over two million sellers on its stores, most of which are small businesses selling physical goods with the help of Amazon tools and services. This volume is far in excess of most developer schemes, and almost certainly far larger than the combined total of content sellers across all developer platforms. Amazon will have little problem building and managing an even larger community as the developer community has largely adopted 'Amazon Web Services' as their cloud platform of choice, and sellers are already familiar and happy with Amazon tools and services. </font></p>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><strong>Amazon and Music: Downloads are not Moving the Needle</strong></h2>
<h2 style="margin: 12pt 0cm 8pt;"><font color="#000000" size="2">In the UK for example, Amazon's share of the overall music retail market was a healthy 13.4% in 2009.<span>&nbsp; </span>Overall, the internet players have the largest share of the music market with 39%, compared to specialist retailers, such as HMV, with 33% and Supermarkets, such as Tesco and Sainsbury's, with 23.6%. In a decade, the internet as an e-commerce channel has overtaken all of the UK's high street. The download only Apple iTunes service with share of 10.6% clearly dominates the online distribution market.</font></h2>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><em>Figure 7: Amazon's Music Share is Healthy but not Dominant</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span><v:shape style="width: 398.25pt; height: 344.25pt; visibility: visible;" id="Chart_x0020_3" o:spid="_x0000_i1028" type="#_x0000_t75" o:gfxdata="UEsDBBQABgAIAAAAIQDVHvRgEwEAAKECAAATAAAAW0NvbnRlbnRfVHlwZXNdLnhtbKySu07EMBBF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"><font size="3"><font color="#597eb8"><em><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image006.png" o:title=""></v:imagedata><o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="f"><font color="#333333"><img style="width: 510px; height: 464px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 7.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%207.png" width="828" height="717" /></font></o:lock></em></font></font></v:shape></span></p>
<p style="text-align: right; margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="right"><font size="2"><font color="#000000">Source: <span>BPI Yearbook 2009</span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></font></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In the USA, Billboard estimated that in 2009 iTunes had 26.7% retail market share, which translated into 65.5% online market share. For a la carte download sales, the iTunes U.S. presence is overwhelming, with an estimated 93% market share.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In contrast, Amazon's MP3 store had an overall 1.3% market share, which translates into about 5% share for a la carte downloads. Amazon commenced digital downloads in 2007 and has been a constant innovator. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The service launched with DRM-free tracks, which were therefore portable between devices, and higher bitrate encoding, providing higher quality to the discerning ear. In the USA, the catalogue has continually grown and from an initial 2m tracks have grown to today having 1.4m albums and 15.2m tracks. But, as befits its corporate strategy of "everyday low pricing", Amazon has put most effort into price innovation. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span><font color="#000000" size="2"><em>Figure 8: Amazon's Smart Targeting and Competitive Pricing</em></font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span><v:shape style="width: 468.75pt; height: 172.5pt; visibility: visible;" id="Picture_x0020_6" o:spid="_x0000_i1027" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="amazon-deals.png"><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image007.png" o:title="amazon-deals"><font color="#333333" size="3"><span><v:shape style="width: 468.75pt; height: 172.5pt; visibility: visible;" id="Picture_x0020_6" o:spid="_x0000_i1027" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="amazon-deals.png"><v:imagedata src="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CCATHER%7E1%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_image007.png" o:title="amazon-deals"><font color="#333333" size="3"><img style="width: 538px; height: 255px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 8.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%208.png" width="977" height="361" /></font></v:imagedata></v:shape></span></font></v:imagedata></v:shape></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Normally, Amazon has the lowest price for its chosen Album of the week. For instance, The Strokes' new album is currently available for £4 compared to iTunes pricing of £8 in the UK. This is typical behaviour of a master retailer, driving customers to their stores through headline offers and promotions to their customers. Apple has a very different approach, relying on an agency model where the content owner has limited choice in setting retail prices. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In the USA, Amazon's Daily Deal launched in June 2008, and it became the subject of a Department of Justice (DOJ) inquiry in May 2010 after iTunes began grumbling about Amazon promotions to the major labels. No comment has been released by the DOJ, but it seems clear that with Apple's huge iTunes share that any attempt to discourage labels from participating in the Amazon promotions might be construed as price fixing. Amazon has continued to play its strongest card - differentiation though price competition.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has built an MP3 application for Android phones which allows the immediate purchase and playing of songs. It is noticeable that they haven't built the same tools for Apple. In fact, the Amazon WindowShop application for the iPad actually displays download prices (and the playing of short clips), but doesn't allow the direct purchase or download. Given Apple's domination of the music download market, and the fact that Apple have allowed the Kindle store to operate on the iPad/iPhone, the STL team predict it will not be long before the DOJ launch another inquiry into Apple's music practices.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In contrast to eBooks, Amazon does not seem to have built significant music share and the STL team puts this down to three main reasons:</font></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2">The Amazon experience of buying music is not as good as Apple iTunes. This is made especially difficult to match as Apple control the device - the mass market seems to prefer convenience over price on low unit price items;</font></font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Symbol;"><span><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;</span></span></span><font size="2">Amazon is not associated with the music market in the same way as Apple is; and</font></font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2">There are plenty of alternatives to paid music downloads. Spotify in Europe and Rhapsody in the USA, although of questionable profitability, have achieved success on other platforms with different business models, providing both paid-for and advertiser funded unlimited music streaming.</font></font></div></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><strong><font style="font-size: 1.56em;">The Move into Streaming</font></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has taken a different approach to Movies than to either Books or Music. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In the UK and Germany, Amazon has recently acquired full ownership of a DVD and streaming service, called LoveFilm. This operates primarily under a subscription model providing access to a library of films. It is the UK and German equivalent of Netflix. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">A subscription business operates under a vastly model than a retailer. It requires a much larger investment in both customer acquisition and retention and in content libraries. There is also reasonable investment required in gaining access and building clients for the plethora of devices coming onto the market to connect TVs to the internet. It also starts to compete with powerful payTV companies that have very deep pockets, large customer bases and similar ambitions.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In the USA, Netflix has managed to build a strong base of customers, a large market capitalization and is currently a darling of both the press and the investor community. The STL team has written extensively in the past about Netflix, its business model and prospects (see: </font><a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_Netflix-v-Hollywood-telcos-help_Summary"><font color="#ff6600" size="2">The Impact of Netflix: Can Telcos Help Hollywood</font></a><font color="#000000" size="2">; </font><a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/EB_entertainment-business-model-crossroads_Summary"><font color="#ff6600" size="2">Entertainment 2.0: New Sources of Revenu for Telcos?</font></a><font color="#000000" size="2">)</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon has decided to enter the fray in the USA with its Instant Video service. This service offers a limited selection of free streaming movies to subscribers of the Amazon Prime service. The Amazon Prime service is priced at US$79/per annum, compared to the Netflix streaming cost of US$8/month ($96/annum).<span>&nbsp; </span>Although, the annual fee may put some off, Amazon seems to have solved the problem of expensive customer acquisition. However, it is questionable whether Amazon under a licensing structure can afford similar levels of investment in content as Netflix.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">A key factor in deciding this will be the support of studios for its model and their willingness to provide premium content and in this Amazon is gaining traction.</font></p>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><em>Figure 9: New Releases are Going to Amazon First</em></p>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="center"><font color="#000000" size="2"><img style="width: 515px; height: 424px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 9.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%209.png" width="977" height="651" /></font></p>
<p style="page-break-after: avoid; margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoCaption" align="left"><font color="#000000" size="2">It is noticeable in the USA that Amazon are heavily promoting download-to-rent and download-to-own options which brings new releases to the library and are favoured by the Movie Industry.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon is also an UltraViolet member which again we have written extensively about (see </font><a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_DECE-Ultraviolet-2011_Summary"><font color="#b20f0b" size="2">Telcos Risk Missing the UltraViolet Online Opportunity</font></a><font color="#000000" size="2">) and it is likely in the near future that Amazon will sell physical DVDs with the right to stream to multiple devices.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">In Movies, STL Partners believes Amazon is uncertain which of the options will win in the future and is willing to invest in a wide range of options; effectively, it's hedging its bets. But as in Music, Amazon has a long way to catch up with early platforms, whether that's Apple, which leads the download-to-rent and own market, or Netflix which leads the subscription business. Again, this makes it an interesting target for partnerships, particularly for content owners looking to establish models that work better for them than Apple or Netflix.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><strong><font style="font-size: 1.56em;">Amazon Shaking up the AppStore Market</font></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Amazon also has a significant business selling both physical electronic games and consoles. It was therefore hardly surprising that it launched Android AppStore heavily populated with games and featuring Angry Birds Rio as its launch game.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><font color="#000000" size="2"><em>Figure 10: Amazon's Appstore</em></font></p><font color="#000000" size="2"><em></em></font>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><img style="width: 535px; height: 373px;" class="mt-image-none" alt="Amazon fig 10.png" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/Amazon%20fig%2010.png" width="977" height="601" /></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal" align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The Amazon AppStore offers some very interesting features, including:</font></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2">The ability to sample the game on a PC before committing to a purchase;</font></font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2">Amazon setting the retail price of the game with the developer only suggesting a retail price;</font></font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2">Free Daily Promotions of leading applications; and</font></font></div></li>
<li>
<div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font size="2">Amazon performing a limited curation role, checking the applications are free of viruses</font></font></div></li></ul>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">There are also teething problems with the service. For example, the Amazon AppStore is impossible to install on some "locked-down" Android handsets.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">But Amazon has entered the market and the STL team believes it will be a serious player for years to come. It is also our belief that Amazon will want to develop AppStores for all major platforms, which will bring them into considerable conflict with certain platform owners, not just Apple.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font style="font-size: 1.56em;" color="#000000" size="2"><strong>Lessons for Other Players in the Digital Entertainment Value Chain</strong></font><span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;"><span class="msoIns"><ins datetime="2011-03-25T10:58" cite="mailto:Andrew"><br style="page-break-before: always;" clear="all" /></ins></span></span><font size="2"><font color="#000000"><strong><em>For Content Owners,</em> </strong>Amazon should be welcomed with open arms. It is a traditional retailer that understands both the low margin nature of retailing and the value of content, especially the hits. It has a large customer base which is growing considerably and consumers are expressing confidence in Amazon with their wallets.</font></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Most importantly for content owners, Amazon currently offers the best route to avoid platform lock-in and domination by platform owners.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="2"><font color="#000000"><i><strong>For Network Service Providers,</strong></i> Amazon offers a salutary lesson in the investment required to be a successful retailer in the digital era. It is obvious that Amazon will be a leading player in the digital world and will accept margins far lower than networks traditional receive. </font></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">The STL team believes that for most networks it is far better to work out a way to co-operate with Amazon than to compete with it. The benchmark for such co-operative agreements was obviously set by Apple, which delivers high value subscribers but largely cuts the networks out of upstream revenues. We believe Amazon will be far more flexible in its business model and therefore makes a more comfortable partner. In fact, Amazon has already demonstrated this flexibility with its "Comes with Data" Kindle model for eBook delivery, for which Vodafone in the UK and AT&amp;T already partner with Amazon. We believe that purchasing payments options, especially for prepaid customers, are another area of possible co-operation. Amazon also has a history of joint promotions with third parties.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Networks really need to ask themselves a difficult question, before they embark on another round of large scale investment in platforms: do they have both the skills and stamina required to be a successful retailer? As a flexible partner and the best retailer on the Internet, Amazon has to provide an attractive potential alternative for all but the most committed.</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="2"><font color="#000000"><strong><i>For device manufacturers</i>, </strong>Amazon offers a quick and easy route to compete with integrated platforms, such as Apple, RIM and possibly the Nokia/Microsoft partnership. From Amazon's point of view, it is also certain that it would prefer its various stores to be loaded onto handsets and tablets at the factory rather than by user demand. Indeed, this could even be something it would pay for in the same way it pays real estate owners for the location of their distribution centres.</font></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">OEMs have to ask a similar question to the networks: Do they have to the skills to be a successful retailer? </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="2">Some device manufacturers may see Amazon as a potential competitor, however, we believe that Amazon would be a reluctant entrant into the device market. The world of phone and tablet manufacture is very different from its core business and while it did this with the Kindle, this was to create a market for its platform and a model for others to follow.<span>&nbsp; </span>We would not expect Amazon to repeat the same investments it has made with the specialist eReader device, the Kindle, with other devices.</font></p>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img style="border: medium none; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=840a2083-fbc2-4b4d-ab6a-628f8833e738" /></a></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>News: Behind the Headlines</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/03/news-behind-the-headlines.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.963</id>

    <published>2011-03-25T10:05:37Z</published>
    <updated>2011-03-28T13:50:52Z</updated>

    <summary>This is the first of a regular series of blog posts that will pick out the some of the more meaningful news stories and look behind the headlines to identify new developments and trends that could affect the broader market...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Catherine Haslam</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=11</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="bskyb" label="BSkyB" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="digitalmusic" label="digital music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="directtv" label="DirectTV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ebooks" label="e-books" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="netflix" label="Netflix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="onlinegamesnewscorp" label="online games. NewsCorp" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payt" label="Pay T" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="starz" label="Starz" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tvnetworks" label="TV Networks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="videodownload" label="video download" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="videostreaming" label="video streaming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="vod" label="VoD" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">This is the first of a regular series of blog posts that will pick out the some of the more meaningful news stories and look behind the headlines to identify new developments and trends that could affect the broader market development.</font></span></p><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Stories in this issue:<br /></font></span></p>
<ul><li><font style="font-size: 1em;">Netflix put to the content test</font></li>
<li><font style="font-size: 1em;">Movies, Games, Music and Books make online advances</font></li>
<li><font style="font-size: 1em;">Network consolidation success and failure</font></li>
</ul>

<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Netflix put to the content test<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Securing high quality content is top of Netflix's agenda again as the US Internet integration giant looks to create its own original content and faces a fight to renew its deal with movie partner Starz.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Rumour: Netflix to create original programming?</font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Netflix is to make its first entry into original programming with a US adaption of the UK political novel "The House Cards" featuring David Fincher (West Wing) and Kevin Spacey, according to reports.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">A move into production is a radical change of model for the internet aggregator, but it is not one without precedent as HBO has previously made the transition successfully. However, it will take significant investment. High End Drama in the USA costs US$4mm-$6mm per episode and the rumoured two-series, 26-episode commitment implies total production cost of over US$100m, although Netflix would be able to defray some of the risk if overseas partners come onboard. See </font><a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/03/netflix-to-enter-original-programming-with-mega-deal-for-david-fincher-kevin-spacey-drama-series-house-of-cards/"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">this Deadline report</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> for more. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Securing the right content is critical to continued success of Netflix and it is facing on-going battles to make the right deals as challengers, such as Amazon, emerge and existing partners flex their own muscles.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Partner blow leaves Netflix chasing Starz<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">At a recent analyst event, Netflix's movie partner Starz fired a shot across the integrator's bow in the build up to contract renewal negotiations between the two. Starz, which provides&nbsp;Netflix&nbsp;with access to Sony and Walt Disney Pictures content, moved to dispel the myth that Netflix had helped its business calling it a "... a little optimistic and perhaps self-serving." </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Starz has previously said that it looked at digital revenue as gravy on top of the US$1.5bn it receives for TV distributors. More worringly for Netflix, Starz said it is probably not in its interest to rush into a new deal with Netflix and it had been speaking with Amazon, which has recently started an internet streaming service.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">The contract is crucial for Netflix as it provides vital content but it will inevitably have to pay significantly more if the deal is to be renewed. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>The noise on the jungle grapevine is that&nbsp;Netflix&nbsp;got the streaming rights for US$25m/year compared to a current market value of US$200m. See the </font><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/liberty-media-ceo-discusses-earthquakes-167804"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">Hollywood Reporter</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> for more.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Streaming costs a drop in the ocean<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">On the positive side, an analysis of Netflix streaming costs implies that its cost to stream a movie has dropped from 5 cents two years ago to 2.5 cents in 2011, primarily due to falling CDN prices. It is estimated that Netflix will spend around US$50m on streaming in 2011, which is a drop in the ocean compared to the cost of content rights and equivalent physical postage expenditure. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Netflix recently released performance data of streaming on various US networks which implies the average user streams around 2Mbps compared to their maximum Netflix encoding of double that. See </font><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_gC6nMAI6mu8/TUHG6jsQq-I/AAAAAAAAADE/Bwe1fkAUxzA/s1600/isp_usa.png"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">Blogspot</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> for more details.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Movies, Games, Music and Books make online advances</font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US"></span></b><span style="" lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">DirectTV's premium VoD offer challenges the traditional window structure as it attempts to kick-start online movie distribution growth and Spotify faces reality of building revenue, while it is full steam ahead for online games and e-books.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Premium VoD opens new window for studios<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">DirectTV will become the first distributor to trial a Premium VoD service when it launches in the middle of 2011. The proposition means consumers will pay US$30 to rent a movie in their homes just 60-days after it opened in theatres and at least 30-days before the movie goes on DVD sale. This represents a brand new window for the movie industry and is much hated by theatre owners. Just talk of opening such a new window highlights how much the movie studios value home entertainment revenues and are looking for ways to improve revenues. Read the full blog on </font><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/03/directv-likely-to-lead-the-launch-of-premium-vod-as-top-theater-executives-voice-outrage.html"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">latimes.com</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Meanwhile the battle of the online video formats, which impacts on the potential of paid for business models, has moved to the USA justice department. Google's attempt to promote WebM, a royalty-free alternative to the MPEG LA royalty bearing H.264 family, was always going to end in acrimony and we expect this battle to continue for many years to come. The </font><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703752404576178833590548792.html"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">Wall Street Journal</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> has the full story.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Gamers rush to get online<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">The Games Industry is moving forward in its online efforts. Sony announced at the 2011 Games Developer Conference that it had 70m users worldwide of its Playstation network and most significantly 70% of those connect to the network every week. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Vivendi, the main shareholder of Activision, also announced in its financial results that it had more than 12m subscribers to its online franchise, World of Warcraft, at the end of 2010. To put that in context, Black Ops, the latest extension of Activision's Call of Duty franchise shifted over 20m units for more than US$1bn in retail sales. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Spotify grows but faces US challenge<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">In the online music world, Spotify announced they had breezed past a million subscribers paying for its services worldwide but all is not plain sailing for the subscription music service. With any freemium business model the ratio of paying to free users is vitally important in terms of financial success, even though free users do bring in some advertising revenues. In Spotify's case, this is 15%, which implies it has 6.7m active users, which itself is some way short of the registered users which passed 10m in September 2010. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Furthermore, Spotify's much-talked about venture across the Atlantic is facing competition from Viacom and MTV spin-off Rhapsody even before it launches in the US. It has extended its usual 14-day free trial to 60-days in an attempt to cover Spotify's launch. Rhapsody has around 750k subscribers in the USA. For more see this </font><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/rhapsody-offers-60-day-trial-ahead-of-rumored-spotify-us-launch-2011-3"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">Business Insider</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> report.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b style=""><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Momentum grows behind e-books<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">The appeal of e-books is reaching critical mass amongst publishers and consumers alike. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Publisher, Bloomsbury, declared 2011 the 'year of the eBook' and announced that eBooks represent 10% of its total print sales and, even more importantly, that new releases attract much higher online numbers. For example, a fiction blockbuster such as The Finkler Question by Man Booker winner, Howard Jacobson, posted digital sales of 42% of the total in the US in its first six months. See this </font><a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/bloomsbury-predicts-2011-be-year-e-book.html"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">Bookseller report</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> for more.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Meanwhile, Random House, which had opted out of the original iPad launch amid concerns over the Apple agency pricing agreement has signed up for the iPad2. This means that all of the 'big six' publishers, the others being: HarperCollins, Penguin Group, Simon &amp; Schuster, Hachette, and Macmillian, are now supporting the iPad. Furthermore, Apple also announced at its ipad2 launch event that over 100m eBooks had been launched through its iBook store in around 10 months, although it didn't reveal how many were free downloads. For more on our view of the iPad2, see <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_tablets-network-poison-palliative_Summary">Tablet Frenzy:&nbsp;Network Poison or Economic Palliative?</a></font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font size="3"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Network consolidation success and failure<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% white;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">The highly politicized acquisition by NewsCorp of BSkyB, with its 10m subscribers and annual operating profits of over £1bn, looks like it is going to be given the green light as the UK </font><a href="http://www.dcms.gov.uk/about_us/our_ministers/7049.aspx"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"><font face="Calibri" size="3">Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport&nbsp;</font></span></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> announced that he intends to accept undertakings from News Corporation that will see BSkyB spun off by NewsCorp as a separate Ltd company. A final period of consultation ends on March 21, when a final decision will be made on whether to give the deal the go-ahead or refer it to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">If allowed, this together with DTH assets in Italy and Germany will make NewsCorp a truly formidable force in the Euro-PayTV industry. Read the </font><a href="http://www.dcms.gov.uk/news/news_stories/7883.aspx"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">announcement in full here</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">. </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">Meanwhile, the auction for the 3</font><sup><font size="2">rd</font></sup><font size="3"> largest German cable network, Kabel Baden-Wuerttemberg, is off as the company has announced its intention to go to IPO. This took the wind out of the sails of John Malone's, Liberty Global, who for a long time, looked as if it would be the primary suitor and thereby consolidating further the Euro-Cable industry. See </font></font></font><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-03-11/kabel-bw-owner-eqt-targets-at-least-690-million-in-ipo.html"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">Business Week</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> for the full story.</font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3">Finally, Liberty Global looks as if it is in process of exiting Australia. Foxtel, the market leading DTH provider, owned by Telstra, NewsCorp and Consolidated Media, is trying to acquire Austar, Foxtel's regional counterpart which is controlled by Liberty Global. </font><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/speculation-rife-on-shape-of-foxtel-bid-for-austar/story-e6frg9if-1226020735303"><font color="#0000ff" face="Calibri" size="3">The Australian</font></a><font color="#000000" face="Calibri" size="3"> has the full story.</font></span></p>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img style="border: medium none; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=82a62c70-b975-40ac-ac56-8425c899c1f1" /></a></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>YouTube: Recent improvements could change the game (again)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/2011/03/youtube-recent-improvements-could-change-the-game-again.html" />
    <id>tag:www.digitalentertainment2.com,2011:/blog//5.944</id>

    <published>2011-03-02T18:12:22Z</published>
    <updated>2011-03-03T09:47:55Z</updated>

    <summary>YouTube&apos;s recent improvements to its business model and balance sheet make it much more attractive to content owners. What are behind these developments and what are the wider implications for all players in the market? With the victory in the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Harrowell</name>
        <uri>http://www.telco2.net/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/stlpartn/managed-mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=5&amp;id=7</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Intellectual Property" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Online Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Really Big Websites" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Two-Sided Business Models" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="brainstorms" label="brainstorms" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="digitalentertainment20" label="digital entertainment 2.0" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newdigitaleconomics" label="new digital economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="youtube" label="YouTube" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>YouTube's recent improvements to its business model and balance sheet make it much more attractive to content owners. What are behind these developments and what are the wider implications for all players in the market?</p>

<p>With the victory in the court case against Viacom, YouTube has eliminated liabilities which threatened its business. A successful music partnership with Vevo has turned some enemies into partners and provides an example to other content owners of the benefits of partnering with YouTube. In the rest of this article we examine these strategies, plus:</p>

<ul>
	<li>    How YouTube has improved the monetization of its assets</li>
	<li>    Innovations in its business model;</li>
	<li>    Strategies that content owners need to take to maximize their share of the market;</li>
	<li>    Implications for Telcos and ISPs.</li>
</ul>
[We'll also be covering these themes in depth at the Digital Entertainment 2.0 stream of the upcoming New Digital Economics Brainstorms (<a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/Americas_April2011/agenda.php">Palo Alto</a>, 4-7 April, <a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/EMEA_May2011/agenda.php">London</a>, 11-13 May, and <a href="http://www.telco2.net/event/">Singapore</a> 22-23 June). You can also email us at <a mailto="contact@telco2.net">contact@telco2.net</a> or call +44 (0) 207 547 5003.]

<h2>Show Me the Money</h2>

<p>There have long been rumbling doubts in the industry about how YouTube makes money for Google, though for a while we've been of the view that it more than earns its keep by how it feeds the overall Google ecosystem (see <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_google-internet-behemoth-youtube_full">'Google - How (precisely) it profits from YouTube'</a>. Today we're further upping our stance to 'formally bullish' and think YouTube is a big plus to Google and its value and contribution will grow considerably in the future.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The rationale for our further change in stance lies not in the immediate profitability of YouTube, which more analysts still think is loss making although the veiled figures make a definitive statement somewhat elusive at this point. Instead, we see the. the key successes of YouTube in the last couple of years in its much improved monetization of viewing and in the strengthening of its balance sheet.</p>

<h2>YouTube dominates Online Video Viewing in The US</h2>

<p><img alt="ComScore Top US Video Properties" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5Bh31419%5D_htm_1f6a1823.jpg" width="384" height="416" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>In the USA, YouTube dominates the online video scene with 144m unique viewers watching over four hours of videos in Jan 2011. The dominance is even more impressive if the partner site, Vevo, is included in the figures. YouTube viewers spend more time on the site than even the broadcaster owned Hulu, who specializes in long form content showing TV shows. To place this in context, average TV viewing in the USA is approximately four hours per day.</p>

<p>As TV's become connected to the internet, the growth opportunities for YouTube are further enhanced. Similar trends to the USA can be seen across the globe with, for instance, almost half of population of the UK, visiting YouTube in any given month.</p>

<h2>Improving Monetisation</h2>

<p>Google doesn't separate out YouTube revenues but in the last earnings call reported that YouTube revenues had "doubled over the last year". Previously, Eric Schmidt had revealed that YouTube revenues had doubled over the period 2007-9. So whilst not knowing the absolute figure, we know for sure that YouTube revenues are growing at an extremely healthy rate. Analyst estimates of the revenues vary widely between US$500m and US$1bn.</p>

<p>Over the last couple of years, YouTube has changed the way it has viewed advertised and created solutions and programs specifically for YouTube. As the Head of Ads for YouTube puts it "When I took this job a year and a half ago, people kept asking 'What is going to be the equivalent of the Google text ad for YouTube?' What we realized is there is no one ad format for video, because consumers come to YouTube to do different things."</p>

<h2>Selling the Home Page</h2>

<p><img alt="The Navi take over the YouTube.com home page" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5Bh31419%5D_htm_m77c39069.jpg" width="255" height="177" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>One of the success stories has been selling the home page, which has been extremely popular with movie marketers keen to drive youngsters to the theatres at the weekend. YouTube has been so successful that it sold out its inventory in the fourth quarter of 2010, with bidding wars between the studios on Thursdays and Fridays promoting the weekend openings. The cost of these home page ads is rumoured to be around $300k/day in the USA, which equates to a US$100m/annum business in the USA.</p>

<p>In the UK, YouTube are selling the front page as well and, in the run up to the last election, the Conservatives bought the front page; another party revealed they had been offered the same deal for £50k. Movies and political ads are traditional fare for any broadcasting network, which shows how far YouTube has come in the last couple of years.</p>

<h2>Improving Fill Rates</h2>

<p>Nobody ever doubted the huge inventory of YouTube, but people questioned whether they would be able to sell it. In a recent interview, the head of ads for YouTube revealed that they were running more than 3 billion adverts a week against its inventory of 14 billion weekly views. A fill rate about of around 20% is nothing special, but this is an increase of 50% in just under a year - another sign YouTube is gaining scale and, more importantly, gaining acceptance with the advertisers.</p>

<h2>Developing a YouTube Search Income Stream</h2>

<p><img alt="Advertising is Still the Core Business" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5Bh31419%5D_htm_m73ea4683.jpg" width="400" height="309" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>For years, companies have uploaded their advertisements to YouTube and promoted them outside of YouTube. In 2009, YouTube launched "Promoted Videos" on the site's search results which are charged on a cost-per-view basis and YouTube claim the auctions regularly clear 10 to 40 times the cost of ads on network TV. The reason is that users that opt-in to watch adverts are paying much more attention than on ad breaks on network TV. YouTube have extended this insight to ads inserted on long form content, where they allow the user to skip an ad if they are not interested.</p>

<h2>Turning Copyright Infringers into revenue for Content Owners</h2>

<p><img alt="Don Draper would have loved ContentID" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5Bh31419%5D_htm_69355c92.jpg" width="650" height="390" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>All videos uploaded to YouTube are now scanned by Google's ContentID system, which generates cryptographic fingerprints in order to compare them to those of original videos provided by known content owners. If infringing material is found, whether a clip of TV show or a Music Video, the content owner is notified and offered the option to either take down the material, or run adverts against it with a revenue share arrangement. For music there is another alternative, where YouTube runs pop-up ads that let people buy the song or the ring tone,and again shares the revenue with the copyright owner. It is estimated that more than a third of the ads that YouTube serves in-stream are against copyright infringers. This has essentially defused the issue.</p>

<h2>Sharing the Rewards of User-Generated Content</h2>

<p>YouTube have realized that User Generated Content needs to be more professional to attract bigger audiences. So they have developed a partner program, where YouTube invite people to join based upon an unknown algorithm, which is presumably based upon popularity. YouTube doesn't reveal the share of advertising, but it is rumored to be just about 50%. YouTube now has around 15,000 partners around the globe. A few YouTube partners have topped a million dollars, hundreds more are making six-figure sums, and many more are making more than the US median salary of $40,000. The net result according to Shenaz Zack, product manager at YouTube, is "We've seen the production value of these videos have gone up tremendously. No longer are they bedroom-only [video bloggers]."</p>

<p>Again, this is a twist on the network TV model. YouTube doesn't take the risk of production costs and instead, rewards the successful few with a revenue share of inventory they sell.</p>

<h2>Going Long Form with Sports</h2>

<p>Sports has long been known to attract huge audiences which are very valuable to advertisers and therefore the broadcast networks pay huge sums of money for the rights. YouTube is getting into the Sports broadcasting business with quite an innovative approach - it is acquiring rights in countries where the rights could not be sold for a revenue share with the content owners.</p>

<p><img alt="YouTube: big in Japan, and India, and a fair few other places" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5Bh31419%5D_htm_5f214db3.jpg" width="650" height="390" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>The first example of this was when YouTube streamed the 2010 Indian Premier League, the world's most popular cricket tournament, generating 51m views over the course of the six-week tournament and becoming the top ranked sports video website in the world. Since then, YouTube has struck a similar deal with Major League Baseball, to be shown in Japan 36 hours after the games originally air with a highlight packages and full length game re-runs.</p>

<p>YouTube has also hired Claude Ruibal, former head of Universal Sports, to drive more Sports deals across the globe. Again, YouTube is becoming to look more like a traditional broadcaster.</p>

<h2>How Content ID helped Banish The Dark Cloud of Copyright Doom</h2>

<p>The biggest headache for YouTube disappeared in June 2010, when a judge ruled that YouTube was protected by the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) against claims of copyright infringement and threw out the Viacom case. The judge found that while there were a huge number of infringing videos on YouTube, the site did take them down when notified. The judge pointed out one instance in 2007 when Viacom gave YouTube a single takedown notice for 100,000 videos, which YouTube successfully took down by the next day. The fact that the case didn't even get to trial meant that the YouTube operations model was validated. YouTube can continue to allow its users to upload anything and only has to take anything down once a DCMA notice is issued to them from the content owners. Effectively the cost of policing YouTube is shifted to someone else.</p>

<p>In practice this forces content owners to co-operate with the YouTube Content ID system described above, with the declared aim of automatically detecting copyright material. This Content ID system will prove incredibly valuable to YouTube over the years and effectively allows YouTube to build the largest rights catalogue and database of meta-tags across the globe.</p>

<h2>The Vevo Partnership: A Win-Win Model for Content Owners</h2>

<p><img alt="Viva Vevo!" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5Bh31419%5D_htm_1ec8a7c6.jpg" width="600" height="487" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>In December 2009, Vevo was launched in the USA with the stated aim of becoming the top music video destination site on the web. In its first month, it overtook MySpace Music and achieved its goal.</p>

<p>YouTube has no equity ownership of Vevo, but provides all the hosting, and although Vevo sells the adverts, YouTube earns a revenue share. Vevo is another important milestone in the YouTube story as it turns yet more litigious content owners into friends. YouTube has found the easiest way of making friends in the content industry is by helping them pick up frequent cheques.</p>

<h2>Looking More and More like a traditional Media Aggregator</h2>

<p><img alt="Google: has money" src="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/blog/images/YouTube%27s%20Vastly%20Improved%20Prospects%202%20Mar%202011%20%28Final%29.docx_%5BB31419%5D_htm_5513385d.png" width="650" height="333" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>

<p>YouTube looks more and more like a traditional media aggregator with the twist that it offers revenue share deals and doesn't take a risk on production costs. YouTube has made great strides in partnering with content owners and improving the monetization of content.</p>

<p>And, as we wrote previously in <a href="http://www.telco2research.com/articles/AN_google-internet-behemoth-youtube_full">Google - How (precisely) it profits from YouTube</a>, YouTube continues to feed the Google machine new data, new opportunities to see. Increasingly, we believe, it will feed it hard cash.</p>

<h2>What should Advertisers, Media Owners, and CSPs do?</h2>

<p>For Advertisers, YouTube is potentially a very strong addition to their arsenal. The YouTube metrics are especially strong and the pricing according to "Cost-per-View" offers a very compelling alternative to the traditional "Cost per Thousand".</p>

<p>For media owners, YouTube has become a fact of life and media owners should be experimenting around how to maximise the value of their content by using YouTube - either as a promotion channel for longer form content or as a destination site itself.</p>

<p>For CSPs, the situation is more challenging. For Mobile Operators who charge tiered data plans, heavy use of YouTube and other online video could be a godsend encouraging users to purchase higher priced data bundles. However, it is of note that at the recent Mobile World Congress a recurrent theme was that the mobile operators do not think YouTube (and others) is paying a fair contribution and generally the solution mooted was lobbying of the EU to ensure that YouTube pays its way in the future.</p>

<p>For fixed line providers, YouTube is not proving to be much a problem in terms of capacity, but the providers are excluded from any revenue stream. A bigger potential problem is where the fixed provider is a video provider in their own right, especially for the cable networks, where YouTube could cannibalize eyeballs away from their own video channels diminishing their value either in the eyes of advertisers, when they are free-to-air, or subscribers, where the channels are paid for.</p>

<p>[Reminder - join us to discuss these themes in depth at the Digital Entertainment 2.0 stream of the upcoming New Digital Economics Brainstorms (<a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/Americas_April2011/agenda.php">Palo Alto</a>, 4-7 April, <a href="http://www.digitalentertainment2.com/EMEA_May2011/agenda.php">London</a>, 11-13 May, and <a href="http://www.telco2.net/event/">Singapore</a> 22-23 June). You can also email us at <a mailto="contact@telco2.net">contact@telco2.net</a> or call +44 (0) 207 547 5003.]</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

